Income Tax Severed Letters - 2014-02-19

Ruling

2013 Ruling 2013-0507161R3 - Supplemental to Ruling 2011-040898

CRA Tags
66.1(6) "Canadian exploration expense" (g)

Principal Issues: Request for confirmation from CRA that events subsequent to the issuance of advance income tax ruling 2011-040898 would not affect the ruling and the opinion given.

Position: The subsequent events do not affect the validity of the ruling given.

Reasons: See below.

Technical Interpretation - External

4 February 2014 External T.I. 2013-0489791E5 - Indian Business Income Conversion to Employment

CRA Tags
81(1)(a)

Principal Issues: Whether the employment income of an Indian sole proprietor would be exempt income under Guideline 2?

Position: Likely not.

Reasons: Residence of employer may not be strong connecting factor in this case.

19 December 2013 External T.I. 2012-0468851E5 F - Deduction for Insolvency

CRA Tags
80(16), 61.3(3), 61.3(1)
maximizing deduction through debt parking with parent rather than simple settlement subject to s. 61.3(3)

Principales Questions: In the particular situation, whether a debt parking situation would give a more favorable result with respect to the application of subsection 63.1(1) to a particular corporation resident in Canada rather than a direct settlement of the debt by the particular corporation.

Position Adoptée: Likely no.

Raisons: General comments with respect to the discretionary power provided to the Minister under subsection 80(16) where an amount would be otherwise deducted under section 61.3, GAAP and the anti-avoidance rule provided under subsection 61.3(3).

18 December 2013 External T.I. 2013-0511101E5 F - Substantial interest - Part VI.1

CRA Tags
191(2), 191(3), 245(2)
creation of substantial interest through redemption of special voting shares
no disposition of shares that became voting by operation of law (due to cancellation of voting shares)
voting rights shifted to 2nd trust with same trustees: no control change
no acquisition of control where votes pass from trust to an estate with the same individuals as executors

Principales Questions: 1. Whether paragraphs 191(3)(a) and (b) apply in a particular situation. 2. Whether there is an acquisition of control of the corporation redeeming the voting shares in the particular situation.

Position Adoptée: 1. No 2. No

Raisons: 1. Wording of the Act. 2. The same persons would control the corporation before and after the redemption of the voting shares.