Please note that the following document, although believed to be correct at the time of issue, may not represent the current position of the CRA.
Prenez note que ce document, bien qu'exact au moment émis, peut ne pas représenter la position actuelle de l'ARC.
Principal Issues: Further to the CRA's administrative position that a LLP or LLLP formed before April 26, 2017 that would otherwise be viewed as a corporation by the CRA may in certain circumstances continue to be viewed as a partnership, what are the Canadian tax implications of the LLLP described in this letter subsequently taking the position that it is a corporation for Canadian tax purposes?
Position: A grandfathered LLLP that subsequently takes the position that it is a corporation for Canadian tax purposes should be considered to have taken inconsistent filing positions between partnership and corporate treatment. As a result, the CRA may issue assessments or reassessments to the particular entity and/or any member of the entity in respect of one or more taxation years, on the basis that the entity was a corporation. We relayed this request to audit for response because it is of an administrative nature.
Reasons: Consistent with prior public announcements (IFA 2017 and 2018).
XXXXXXXXXX 2018-076856
Y. Moreno
August 1, 2019
Dear XXXXXXXXXX:
Re: Administrative Position on US LLPs & LLLPs
This is in reply to your letter of June 29, 2018. Notwithstanding our prior determination that Delaware and Florida LLPs or LLLPs are generally considered to be corporations for Canadian tax purposes, at the 2017 Annual Conference of the International Fiscal Association (“IFA 2017”), the CRA announced that it would be adopting the administrative practice of allowing any such entity formed before April 26, 2017 to file as a partnership for all prior and future taxation years, provided the following three conditions are met:
- No member of the entity and/or the entity itself takes inconsistent positions from one taxation year to another, or for the same taxation year, between partnership and corporate treatment;
- There is no significant change in the membership and/or the activities of the entity; and
- The entity is not being used to facilitate abusive tax avoidance.
You have described a scenario involving two grandfathered LLLPs that have filed as partnerships for Canadian tax purposes since the time of their formation. The LLLPs are held by Canadian resident corporations and are looking to be treated as corporations for Canadian tax purposes on a prospective basis.
You have asked that we clarify the application of the administrative position in regards to this hypothetical fact pattern.
Our Comments
This technical interpretation provides general comments about the provisions of the Income Tax Act. It does not confirm the income tax treatment of a particular situation involving a specific taxpayer but is intended to assist you in making that determination. The income tax treatment of particular transactions proposed by a specific taxpayer will only be confirmed by this Directorate in the context of an advance income tax ruling request submitted in the manner set out in Information Circular IC 70-6R9, Advance Income Tax Rulings and Technical Interpretations.
In our view, the change by the LLLPs from partnership to corporate treatment constitutes taking an inconsistent position from one taxation year to the next and accordingly, the first condition noted above would not be met.
As stated at IFA 2017, where any of these conditions is not met in respect of any such entities formed before April 26, 2017, the CRA may issue assessments or reassessments to the members and/or the entity, for one or more taxation years, on the basis that the entity was always a corporation.
The LLLPs will not be viewed as corporations for Canadian tax purposes on a solely prospective basis.
Upon the termination of existence of a grandfathered LLP or LLLP, such entity will cease to be subject to the administrative grandfathering.
A working group (the “Working Group”) lead by the International, Large Business and Investigations Branch is in charge of transitional and compliance issues related to the administrative practice described in this letter. We have forwarded your request to the Working Group for its consideration and response. If you have any questions regarding your request, you may contact Mr. Marc Gautreau of the Canada Revenue Agency (Assumption Place Building, Moncton, New Brunswick, E1C 8P2).
Yours truly,
Yves Moreno
for Division Director
International Tax Division
Income Tax Rulings Directorate
Legislative Policy and Regulatory Affairs Branch
All rights reserved. Permission is granted to electronically copy and to print in hard copy for internal use only. No part of this information may be reproduced, modified, transmitted or redistributed in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, or stored in a retrieval system for any purpose other than noted above (including sales), without prior written permission of Canada Revenue Agency, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0L5
© Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 2019
Tous droits réservés. Il est permis de copier sous forme électronique ou d'imprimer pour un usage interne seulement. Toutefois, il est interdit de reproduire, de modifier, de transmettre ou de redistributer de l'information, sous quelque forme ou par quelque moyen que ce soit, de facon électronique, méchanique, photocopies ou autre, ou par stockage dans des systèmes d'extraction ou pour tout usage autre que ceux susmentionnés (incluant pour fin commerciale), sans l'autorisation écrite préalable de l'Agence du revenu du Canada, Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0L5.
© Sa Majesté la Reine du Chef du Canada, 2019
Email this Content