Income Tax Severed Letters - 2021-04-14

Ruling

2015 Ruling 2015-0573231R3 - Qualifying environmental trust

Unedited CRA Tags
20(1)(ss), 107.3(1), 211.6

Principal Issues: 1. Whether the proposed Trust meets the definition of a “qualifying environmental trust” as defined in subsection 211.6(1) of the Act.
2. Whether contributions made by the Corporation to the Trust will be deductible in computing the Corporation’s income pursuant to paragraph 20(1)(ss) of the Act. 3. Whether a debt obligation that meets the definition of a "qualified investment" in paragraph (b) of the definition of that term in section 204 of the Act will be a "prohibited investment" of the Trust for the purpose of the definition of that term in subsection 211.6(1).

Position: 1. Yes 2. Yes provided that the Trust continues to qualify as a qualifying environmental trust at the time of the contribution. 3. No

Reasons: Based on the facts presented

2015 Ruling 2015-0573201R3 - Qualifying environmental trust

Unedited CRA Tags
20(1)(ss), 107.3(1), 211.6

Principal Issues: 1. Whether the proposed Trust meets the definition of a “qualifying environmental trust” as defined in subsection 211.6(1) of the Act.
2. Whether contributions made by the ACo on behalf of ACo L.P. to the Trust will be deductible in computing ACo L.P.'s income pursuant to paragraph 20(1)(ss) of the Act. 3. Whether a debt obligation that meets the definition of a "qualified investment" in paragraph (b) of the definition of that term in section 204 of the Act will be a "prohibited investment" of the Trust for the purpose of the definition of that term in subsection 211.6(1). 4. For the purposes of subsection 107.3(1) of the Act, whether the entire amount of any income or loss of the Trust can reasonably be considered to be ACo L.P.'s share of such income or loss.

Position: 1. Yes 2. Yes provided that the Trust continues to qualify as a qualifying environmental trust at the time of the contribution. 3. No 4. Yes

Reasons: Based on the facts presented

2015 Ruling 2015-0573211R3 - Qualifying environmental trust

Unedited CRA Tags
20(1)(ss), 107.3(1), 127.41, 211.6

Principal Issues: 1. Whether the proposed Trust meets the definition of a “qualifying environmental trust” as defined in subsection 211.6(1) of the Act.
2. Whether contributions made by the ACo on behalf of ACo L.P. to the Trust will be deductible in computing ACo L.P.'s income pursuant to paragraph 20(1)(ss) of the Act. 3. Whether a debt obligation that meets the definition of a "qualified investment" in paragraph (b) of the definition of that term in section 204 of the Act will be a "prohibited investment" of the Trust for the purpose of the definition of that term in subsection 211.6(1). 4. For the purposes of subsection 107.3(1) of the Act, whether the entire amount of any income or loss of the Trust can reasonably be considered to be ACo L.P.'s share of such income or loss.

Position: 1. Yes 2. Yes provided that the Trust continues to qualify as a qualifying environmental trust at the time of the contribution. 3. No 4. Yes

Reasons: Based on the facts presented

Conference

7 October 2020 APFF Roundtable Q. 15, 2020-0852271C6 F - Corporate attribution rules

Unedited CRA Tags
74.4(2)
s. 74.4(2) could apply to a s. 51 estate freeze-style reorganization by two spouses in favour of two discretionary trusts for them and their spouse

Principal Issues: Mr. X and Mrs. X each own 50% of the common shares of the capital stock of a corporation that is not a small business corporation. Mr. X and Mrs. X exchange their common shares of the capital stock of the corporation in consideration for preferred shares of the capital stock of the corporation pursuant to subsection 51(1). Two discretionary family trusts (Trust Mr. X and Trust Mrs. X) then each subscribe for an equal number of new common shares of the capital stock of the corporation for nominal consideration. Mr. X and Mrs. X are both beneficiaries of Trust Mr. X and Trust Mrs. X. Whether subsection 74.4(2) applies in the situation described.

Position: The fact that Trust Mr. X and Trust Mrs. X would each own 50% of the new common shares of the capital stock of the corporation would not, in and by itself, prevent the application of subsection 74.4(2). Since Mr. X and Mrs. X would presumably be entitled to receive more than 50% of the income of the corporation because of their respective interest in both Trust Mr. X and Trust Mrs. X, subsection 74.4(2) could apply if one of the main purposes of the transfer may reasonably be considered to be to reduce the income of Mr. X or Mrs. X and to benefit the other spouse.

Reasons: According to the law and previous positions.

7 October 2020 APFF Roundtable Q. 16, 2020-0867071C6 F - APFF Q.16 - Withholding tax on swap payment

Unedited CRA Tags
212(1)(b)
interest is no longer imputed on mismatched cross-border swap payments
all amounts payable or receivable under a swap are on income account

Principales Questions: Whether portion of periodic payment under a swap agreement made to non-arm's length non-resident is considered interest and therefore subject to withholding tax, as provided in answer to question 60 of the 1984 CTF Roundtable.

Position Adoptée: No.

Raisons: The 1984 Position attempts to look to the economic substance of a financial instrument and bifurcate a payment between interest income and section 9 income. This position is difficult to support in light of jurisprudence, provisions of the Act, and many administrative views expressed by Rulings on the taxation of derivative financial instruments. Consistent with the Supreme Court of Canada’s comments in Shell Canada Ltd v the Queen, [1999] 3 S.C.R. 622 (SCC), the better view is that no portion of the swap payment can be considered interest, and therefore, withholding tax does not apply.

7 October 2020 APFF Roundtable Q. 17, 2020-0845821C6 F - Part IV tax and trust

Unedited CRA Tags
53(2)(h), 104(6), 104(13), 104(19), 186
various applications of proposition that an s. 104(19) designation is not effective until the trust’s year end
s. 104(13), unlike s. 104(19), can apply contemporaneously with a trust dividend distribution, and ss. 186(2) and 251(1)(b) can apply synergistically
under the ordinary meaning of payable, an amount is payable at a time if it is paid then
Words and Phrases
payable

Principales Questions: A personal trust (Trust) is the sole shareholder of a corporation (Opco). Another corporation (Gesco) is a beneficiary of the trust. The end of the taxation years of Trust and Opco is December 31 and September 30 for Gesco. On September 20, 20X1, Opco pays a taxable dividend of $5,000 to Trust and on the same day Trust remits the amount to Gesco.
1) When does Opco have to be connected to Gesco for the calculation of Part IV tax by Gesco? 2) How would Gesco calculate Part IV tax if after September 20, 20X1 but before December 31, 20X1 Trust disposed of all the shares of Opco to a third party ? 3) What would be the consequences for Gesco for the calculation of Part IV tax if Gesco is not a beneficiary of Trust on December 31, 20X1? 4) What would be the consequences for Gesco for the calculation of Part IV tax if after September 20, 20X1 Gesco is a beneficiary of Trust but ceased to be controlled by a person that is not dealing at arm’s length with Opco?

Position Adoptée: 1) To be valid, a designation under subsection 104(19) has to be made in Trust’s tax return. The amount of taxable dividend designated by Trust is deemed to be received by the beneficiary (Gesco) at the time that is the end of the taxation year of Trust in which the dividend was received by Trust. A connected relationship has to be determined at the time the beneficiary is deemed to have received the taxable dividend, which is at the end of the taxation year of Trust. 2) At the end of the taxation year of Trust, Opco would not be connected to Gesco. If Trust designates the amount of taxable dividend under subsection 104(19) received from Opco to Gesco in its December 31, 20X1 tax return, Gesco would be subject to Part IV tax under paragraph 186(1)(a) in its September 30, 20X2 tax return. 3) Under subsection 104(13), there shall be included in computing the income for a particular taxation year of a beneficiary (Gesco) under a trust such part of the amount that, but for subsections 104(6) and 104(12), would be the trust’s income for the trust’s taxation year that ended in the particular year as became payable in the trust’s year to the beneficiary. Since Gesco was a beneficiary of Trust when Trust made the payment, Trust may designate under subsection 104(19) the amount of $5,000 to Gesco to be a taxable dividend. If on December 31, 20X1, Opco is connected to Gesco by virtue of subsection 186(4), paragraph 186(1)(a) would apply, otherwise paragraph 186(1)(b) would be applicable. 4) Under paragraph 25(1)(b) a taxpayer and a personal trust are deemed not to deal with each other at arm’s length if the taxpayer, or any person not dealing at arm’s length with the taxpayer, would be beneficially interested in the trust if subsection 248(25) were read without reference to subclauses 248(25)(b)(iii)(A)(II) to (IV). Trust and Gesco are not dealing at arm’s length. Since more that 50% of the shares of Opco are owned by Trust, and Trust is not dealing at arm’s length with Gesco, consequently Gesco controls Opco pursuant to subsection 186(2). Accordingly, under paragraph 186(4)(a), Opco is connected to Gesco. If Trust designates, under subsection 104(19), the amount of taxable dividend received from Opco to Gesco, Gesco would be subject to Part IV tax under paragraph 186(1)(a) in its December 31, 20X2 tax return. If there is no designation by Trust under subsection 104(19), the amount received by Gesco would not be a taxable dividend and Gesco would not be subject to Part IV tax.

Raisons: Application of the Act and previous positions.