Income Tax Severed Letters - 2023-08-02

Conference

17 May 2023 IFA Roundtable Q. 1, 2023-0964391C6 - stock based compensation and transfer pricing

Unedited CRA Tags
7(3)(b), 110(1)(e), 247
stock-compensation expenses may be relevant to pricing cross-border services charges even where s. 7(3)(b) prohibits their deduction
s. 7(3)(b) non-deduction or s. 112(1)(e) deductibility could apply to cross-border stock option recharges of non-resident parent

Principal Issues: Do recent changes affecting deductions for stock based compensation have transfer pricing implications?

Position: Probably no material impact.

Reasons: para. 7(3)(b) is unchanged and the new deduction under para. 110(1)(e) has significant limitations.

17 May 2023 IFA Roundtable Q. 2, 2023-0964301C6 - Ukraine Russia FAs and Tax Reporting

Unedited CRA Tags
sections 220(2.1), 220(3.1), 162(5), 162(10), 163(2.4), 233.1 (T106), 233.2 (T1141), 233.3 (T1135), 233.4 (T1134), 233.6 (T1142), and 233.8 (RC4649)
failure to file complete information for affiliate in war-torn country
potential relief from return-filing requirements re FA in war-torn country

Principal Issues: Some Canadian multinationals have subsidiaries in Ukraine or Russia that continued operating during 2022 in those countries. Due to the war, financial reporting from these subsidiaries may not be available for 2022. Will CRA grant any administrative relief in relation to the reporting requirements of Canadian multinationals covering their subsidiaries in Ukraine or Russia in case of tax reporting covering international operations, such as country-by-country reporting, forms T1134, etc. What is the CRA’s position with respect to such cases.

Position: Relief will be granted in certain circumstances. See response below.

Reasons: It is the practice of the CRA to determine on a case-by-case basis whether relief is appropriate in respect of the filing obligations under sections 233.1 (T106), 233.2 (T1141), 233.3 (T1135), 233.4 (T1134), 233.6 (T1142), and 233.8 (RC4649) of the Income Tax Act (“Act”). In respect of information that is factually not available at the time form T1141 or form T1134 is due to be filed, the due diligence exception in section 233.5 is available provided a description of each of a) the unavailable information, b) the circumstances making the information unavailable, and c) an explanation of the steps taken to obtain the information are provided on the form. The application of section 233.5 would also relieve any potential penalty under subsection 162(5).
If the particular taxpayer’s specific facts and circumstances warrant, the CRA will also consider granting relief under subsection 220(2.1) from the obligation to provide prescribed information or additional documents (e.g., the unconsolidated financial statements of a Ukrainian foreign affiliate that otherwise must be filed with form T1134). Although the CRA may provide relief in respect of the provision of prescribed information normally required in foreign reporting forms, the forms must still be filed by the taxpayer on or before the respective form’s filing due date.

17 May 2023 IFA Roundtable Q. 3, 2023-0964551C6 - T1134 Supplement

Unedited CRA Tags
15(1); 90(2); 90(5); 93.2; 95(7); 162(5); 162(7); 163(2.4); 233.4; 233.5; definitions of "dividend" and "stock dividend" in subsection 248(1)
a pro rata distribution by an LLLP to its members is a dividend
T1134 should be timely-filed with missing information noted

Principal Issues: Part II Section 3(A)(2) of the T1134 supplement requires disclosure of dividends paid by a foreign affiliate. 1. Is the definition of dividends based on Canadian or foreign corporate/tax principles? 2. If subsection 90(2) applies but the taxpayer does not have information on whether the distributions are made on a pro rata basis, would the due diligence exception under section 233.5 be available?

Position: 1. The definition should be based on provisions of the Act. 2. It depends.

Reasons: 1. Subsections 90(2) and 90(5) together provide an all-encompassing definition of a dividend from a foreign affiliate for the purposes of the Act. 2. The CRA would expect that the determination of the distributions made by the foreign affiliate be based on all the information that can reasonably be obtained in a given situation.

17 May 2023 IFA Roundtable Q. 4, 2023-0965421C6 - Canada-Barbados Income Tax Convention – “Special Tax Benefit”

Unedited CRA Tags
Article XXX(3) of the Canada-Barbados Treaty
Class 2 licensees under the Barbados Insurance Act receive a “special tax benefit” for purposes of the Treaty-benefit exclusion

Principal Issues: Under the Insurance Act (Barbados), a Class 2 licence entitles the company to insure third-party risks wherever situated. The tax rate on all insurance companies with a Class 2 licence is 2%. Does the 2% rate constitute a “special tax benefit” within the meaning of Article XXX(3) of the Canada-Barbados Treaty?

Position: Yes.

Reasons: See below.

17 May 2023 IFA Roundtable Q. 5, 2023-0965771C6 - Remote Work Arrangements

Unedited CRA Tags
Section 253; Canada – U.S. Income Tax Convention
whether Canadian home offices of US employees can give rise to it carrying on business in Canada
whether employee’s home office can constitute a PE of US employer
product development from Canadian home office might engage s. 253(a)
s. 253(b) does not extend to “invitation to treat” or advertisement

Principal Issues: Canadian tax issues for U.S. resident employers of Canadian resident employees under remote work arrangements.

Position: Subject to facts and circumstances.

Reasons: Application of section 253 and prior positions.

17 May 2023 IFA Roundtable Q. 6, 2023-0964351C6 - Application of the Canada-US Treaty

Unedited CRA Tags
Paragraph 212(13)(f), 212(13.2)(b), Article IV(6), Article XI, Article XXIX-A
Treaty benefits could be created for a s. 216 structure by creating partnerships for US purposes

Principal Issues: Does the Treaty apply to exempt the interest from the Canadian withholding tax in the described structures involving fiscally transparent entities?

Position: Basic Structure – No; First modified structure - Yes; Second modified structure – Yes.

Reasons: Application of the Treaty and prior positions.

17 May 2023 IFA Roundtable Q. 7, 2023-0964521C6 - Application of Article 10, Canada-Hong Kong

Unedited CRA Tags
Hong Kong Agreement Article 10(2) and 10(7)
violating main purpose test in HK Treaty increases dividend rate/ PPT object and purpose test not violated by using personal holding company in same jurisdiction
the PPT object and purpose test is met where individuals in a Treaty country transfer their Canco shares to a Treaty-resident Holdco to reduce dividend withholding

Principal Issues: Will Article 10(7) block access to treaty benefits in the circumstances described? Will the MLI's coming into effect with respect to the Canada-Hong Kong Agreement alter the results?

Position: 1. Article 10(7) will generally not apply in this situation. 2. Under Article 7(1) of the MLI, the same conclusion applies.

Reasons: see analysis below

17 May 2023 IFA Roundtable Q. 8, 2023-0964561C6 - Tax-free Surplus Balance and Paragraph 88(1)(d)

Unedited CRA Tags
88(1)(d)(ii); Reg 5905(5.4), (5.5)
no surplus calculations needed where FA of Canadian target is acquired by Forco through a Cdn. Buyco and then promptly bumped (under s. 88(1)(d)) and distributed to Forco
surplus computation not required in typical bump and run transaction

Principal Issues: For purposes of a paragraph 88(1)(d) bump to the ACB of a foreign affiliate's shares, whether CRA will raise an issue with a foreign affiliate's tax-free surplus calculations, or lack thereof, in a specific situation.

Position: No, provided the conditions as outlined in CRA's previous 2011 administrative position are met in a particular situation as described in that 2011 position, CRA will not raise an issue with a foreign affiliate's tax-free surplus balance calculations, or lack thereof, in computing the bump to the ACB of the foreign affiliate shares.

Reasons: In the particular situation outlined, and provided the conditions are met, the surplus balances of the particular foreign affiliate will cease to be relevant following the sale of the foreign affiliate out from under Canada. As any tax-free surplus grind to the bump would result in a gain on disposition which would be eliminated with a 93(1) election, the requirement for tax-free surplus calculations would be a redundant exercise since surplus available for a 93(1) election would generally equal the tax-free surplus balance.