Income Tax Severed Letters - 2024-02-21

Ruling

2022 Ruling 2022-0945301R3 - Post-mortem Pipeline

Unedited CRA Tags
84.1, 84(2), 70(5)(a), 245(2)

Principal Issues: 1) Whether section 84.1 applies to deem the estate to have received a dividend on the disposition of shares to the new corporation. 2) Whether subsection 84(2) applies to the proposed transactions. 3) Whether subsection 245(2) applies to the proposed transactions.

Position: 1) No. Favourable ruling given. 2) No. Favourable ruling given. 3) No. Favourable ruling given.

Reasons: Based on the provisions of the Act, jurisprudence, and CRA publications.

2021 Ruling 2020-0875391R3 - Post-acquisition restructuring

Unedited CRA Tags
15(1.5), 40(3), 56(2), 92(2), 95(1), 95(2)(c), 212.1(4)
application of s. 212.1(4) where ultimate joint acquisition of most of NR Target structure by Cdn. Taxpayer and NR Pubco, but with Taxpayer maintaining control of Target's Canco until it is sold to Taxpayer to eliminate the sandwich structure
application of s. 15(1.5) to demerger to split active businesses between two sets of countries

Principal Issues: 1. Does subsection 212.1(4) apply to the Transactions? 2. Does paragraph 95(2)(c) apply to the Transactions? 3. Does subparagraph 15(1.5)(a)(i) apply to the Proposed Transactions?

Position: 1. Yes. 2. Yes. 3.Yes.

Reasons: 1. Based on the factual representations provided by the Taxpayer, the conditions for the application of subsection 212.1(4) will be met. 2. The conditions for the application of paragraph 95(2)(c) will be met. 3. The conditions for the application of subparagraph 15(1.5)(a)(i) will be met.

2021 Ruling 2021-0889411R3 - Multi-wing net asset butterfly reorganization

Unedited CRA Tags
55(1) and (2); 55(3)(b); 55(5); 55(3.1); 84(2) and (3); 85; 88(1) and (2); 186(1) and (2); 187.1; 191(1) and (2); 251(2)

Principal Issues: Whether the proposed butterfly reorganization meets the requirements stated in paragraph 55(3)(b).

Position: Yes.

Reasons: The proposed butterfly reorganization meets the requirements stated in paragraph 55(3)(b) and is not subject to any of the butterfly denial rules found in paragraphs 55(3.1)(a), (b) and (c).

Technical Interpretation - External

24 February 2022 External T.I. 2019-0820961E5 - Prescribed International Organization

Unedited CRA Tags
Regulation 8900(1)(a), 110(1)(f)(iii)

Principal Issues: Is the World Food Programme (WFP) a prescribed international organization in accordance with subsection 8900(1) of the Regulations, for purposes of subparagraph 110(1)(f)(iii)?

Position: Yes.

Reasons: The WFP, being a subsidiary organ of the General Assembly, is an integral part of the United Nations. Therefore, pursuant to paragraph 8900(1)(a) of the Regulations, it is a prescribed international organization for the purposes of subparagraph 110(1)(f)(iii) of the Act.

Conference

29 August 2023 Roundtable, 2023-0984901C6 - CPAC – Q20 – Guidance on Cryptocurrency

Unedited CRA Tags
233.3(1), 248(1) of the ITA, 123(1) and 165 of the ETA

Principal Issues: Whether.

Position: It depends on the facts.

Technical Interpretation - Internal

6 October 2022 Internal T.I. 2021-0911541I7 - Subsection 227(6) refund of Part XIII tax

Unedited CRA Tags
227(6), (7), (10.1), Canada-Barbados tax treaty
CRA has no discretion to extend the 2-year refund application deadline under s. 227(6)
s. 227(10.1) cannot be used to extend the period for applying for a Pt. XIII tax refund
s. 221.2 of no assistance to address late application for s. 227(6) refund

Principal Issues: 1. What are the general requirements to obtain a refund of Part XIII tax under subsection 227(6)?
2. What is the recourse available to a non-resident of Canada (resident of Barbados) when the period to apply to request a refund of Part XIII tax under subsection 227(6) has ended?

Position: 1. Generally, a request for a refund of overpaid Part XIII tax is made by sending a completed Form NR7-R, Application for Refund of Part XIII Tax Withheld, to the CRA. Regardless of the form of the written request, subsection 227(6) specifies that the application for a refund must be made by the taxpayer “no later than 2 years after the end of the calendar year in which the amount was paid…”
2. In our view, there is no relief available to the non-resident in the proposed situation.

Reasons: An assessment under subsection 227(7) cannot be made when the two-year limitation period in subsection 227(6) has not been met. An assessment under subsection 227(10.1) is not required because there is no balance owing, or collectible amount outstanding, with respect to the non-resident’s Part XIII tax liability.
In addition, there is no relief available to a taxpayer under the Canada-Barbados Tax Convention to override the two-year limitation period required by subsection 227(6).
Re-appropriation under section 221.2 is not available to the non-resident, mainly because this would override Parliament's intention to limit the access to the excess amount of Part XIII tax to two years.
In addition, as the tax was paid by the payor on behalf of the non-resident, only the non-resident has the right to receive the excess amount of remitted Part XIII tax. The fact that the non-resident did not file a refund request in a timely manner does not provide the payor with the right to any excessive Part XIII remittance.