Schedule VI

Table of Contents

Part I

Section 2

Cases

Hedges v. Canada, 2016 FCA 19

authorizations to possess marihuana were not sale exemptions

The appellant (“Hedges”) sold illegally produced dried marihuana to an intermediary (“BCCS”) which, in turn, sold it to individual members suffering from ailments. Although it was accepted by the Crown that the product was a “drug,” it was not zero-rated under Sched. VI-I-2(d) if it could “be obtained without a prescription or Ministerial exemption” (para. 4). Although Hedges and BCCS in fact had not been issued authorizations to possess marihuana (ATPs) by Health Canada, Hedges argued inter alia that the ATPs constituted “exemptions” permitting the sale of marihuana - so that marihuana did not come within this carve-out for drugs which could be sold without an exemption.

After first concluding (at para. 20) that “the zero-rated supply was intended to apply to certain drugs that could be legally sold to a consumer,” and noting (at para. 24) that “it would be illogical to tax a drug that may be lawfully sold to a consumer, (i.e., all the drugs captured by the carve out) but to exempt from taxation a drug that is not lawfully sold,” Rennie JA went on to reject the above argument, stating (at paras. 25, 29):

An ATP is an authorization…[and] is not an exemption.

… While holding an ATP may exempt one from the application of the criminal law, it is not an “exemption” as contemplated by fiscal legislation… .

Words and Phrases
exemption
Locations of other summaries Wordcount
Tax Topics - General Concepts - Illegality illogical to infer a tax benefit from illegal sales 153
Tax Topics - Statutory Interpretation - Headings heading did not contemplate illegal drugs 100

See Also

Hedges v. The Queen, 2014 TCC 270, aff'd 2016 FCA 19

marihuana is a drug but "Authorization to Possess" it is not a purchase "exemption"

Hedges was assessed for his failure to charge GST on his sales of illegally produced dried marihuana to an intermediary ("BCCCS"), which in turn sold it to individual members suffering from ailments. After a detailed review of the regulatory regime, including the Marihuana Medical Access Regulations permitting sales by licensed producers to patients who, following certification by a medical practitioner, had received an "Authorization to Possess" (ATP) from Health Canada, C Miller J found that zero-rating of the product under Sched. VI, Part I, s. 2(d) turned on whether, as a general mater, dried marihuana was a "drug" which "may [not], under the MMARs, be sold to a consumer without a prescription or exemption" (para. 74).

He found that it was a "drug" as broadly defined in the Food and Drugs Act (noting at para. 67 that "dried marihuana sold for use recreationally is not a drug as defined under the FDA, while dried marihuana sold for use therapeutically is") and rejected Crown submissions that the term should be restricted to drugs approved under the FDA and accessible by prescription.

However, he found (at para. 84) that "the medical declaration required to be completed by a practitioner pursuant to the MMARs is not an order nor is it given to a pharmacist [and] is clearly not a prescription" and further found (at paras. 94-6) that an ATP is not as exemption. The appeal was dismissed.

Administrative Policy

Excise and GST/HST News - No. 97 17 November 2015

Importations of donor eggs

[S]upplies of human sperm and oocytes are not drugs that are included in section 2 of Part I of Schedule VI and therefore are not zero-rated under this section. In addition, section 5 of Part I of Schedule VI zero-rates supplies of human sperm. However, there is no corresponding provision in the Act that zero-rates supplies of human oocytes.

GST Memoranda Series 4.1 "Prescription Drugs and Biologicals" ETA - Schedule VI Part II

GST M 300-4-2 "Health Care Services"

Paragraph 2(a)

Administrative Policy

8 March 2018 CBA Commodity Taxes Roundtable, Q.3

Le Gardeur decision on zero-rating based on a component being zero-rated has not been accepted

Although CRA’s position was that supplies of in vitro diagnostic test kits designed for laboratory use are taxable, the Centre Hospitalier Le Gardeur decision (2007 TCC 425) found that certain in vitro diagnostic test kits are zero-rated pursuant to Sched. VI, Pt. I, s. 2(a). In Notice 248, Application of the GST/HST to Supplies of in Vitro Diagnostic Test Kits (December 2009), CRA stated:

The CRA is currently reviewing the impact of the TCC decision, which is dated July 20, 2007. In the interim, the CRA has adopted an administrative position which is in keeping with the TCC decision. This position applies from the date of the TCC decision until such time as the CRA review in this matter is completed.

Has this review been completed? CRA indicated that it was awaiting the Patterson Dental decision for clarification of this issue.

Paragraph 2(b)

Administrative Policy

Excise and GST/HST News - No. 101 March 2017

Hormonal, but not copper, intrauterine devices are zero-rated

Hormonal IUDs have a reservoir which slowly releases hormones used for contraception. … Copper IUDs have a plastic frame that is wound around with copper wire or has copper sleeves. …

[H]ormonal IUDs available in Canada contain the drug levonorgestrel which is on the list established under subsection 29.1(1) of the Food and Drugs Act and require a prescription from a physician to be purchased. … Therefore, the supply of hormonal IUDs is zero-rated pursuant to paragraph 2(b) of Part I of Schedule VI….

[S]ales of copper IUDs are subject to GST/HST....

The Prescription Drug List

list of phrmaceutical drugs pusuant to FDA s. 29.1(1)

Paragraph 2(e)

Cases

Patterson Dental Canada Inc. v. Canada, 2020 FCA 40

anesthetic containing epinephrine was not epinephrine

The taxpayer sold anesthetic solutions containing epinephrine to dentists, and was assessed for failure to charge GST on the basis that such supplies did not qualify under Sched. VI, Pt. I, s. 2(e) of any of the “drugs” listed therein including “epinephrine and its salts.” The taxpayer submitted that the single-supply doctrine deemed its sales to be that of the main element, which was zero-rated.

Before rejecting this submission, Gleason JA noted (at para. 16) that the legislative history indicated that s.2(e) comprised non-prescription drugs used to treat life-threatening illnesses, whereas, here, the epinephrine had no anesthetic effect and instead acted as a vasopressor (constricting blood vessels) to stem bleeding, and then stated (at paras. 23-24, 27):

Accordingly, the supply of epinephrine in combination with an analgesic in the appellant’s solutions is not a single supply containing a taxable and zero-rated element.

Second … [t]he case law establishes that the zero-rated element must be the principal element in the single supply if the supply is to be zero-rated. …

… [B]oth common sense and the expert evidence establish that the reason for administration of dental anesthetics - including those containing epinephrine - is pain control … . Thus, the predominant element in the appellant’s epinephrine-containing anesthetic solutions is not epinephrine but rather the local anesthetic.

Locations of other summaries Wordcount
Tax Topics - Excise Tax Act - Section 123 - Subsection 123(1) - Supply the single supply doctrine did not deem an anesthetic containing a drug substance to be that drug 143

See Also

Patterson Dental Canada Inc. v. The Queen, 2018 TCC 112, aff'd 2020 FCA 40

zero-rating for epinephrine did not include a drug containing epinephrine

The taxpayer sold anesthetic solutions containing epinephrine to dentists, and (notwithstanding an adverse Technical Interpretation letter received by its consultant) did not charge GST on the basis of the zero-rating in Sched. VI, Pt. I, s. 2(e) of any of the listed drugs including “epinephrine and its salts.” The epinephrine had no anesthetic effect and instead acted as a vasopressor (constriction of blood vessels) to prolong the duration of the local anesthetic.

In confirming that the supplies were not zero-rated, Favreau J first stated (at paras 45-47):

As stated in the Finances Technical Notes (April 2017 and April 2012), paragraph 2(e) of Part I of Schedule VI of the ETA enumerates a list of non‑prescription drugs used to treat life-threatening conditions that are zero-rated at all levels of production and distribution. …

There is no doubt in my mind that the epinephrine and its salts and the anesthetic solutions containing epinephrine supplied by the appellant come within the definition of the term “drug” as defined under the Canadian Food and Drugs Act

However, drugs which have epinephrine as their sole active ingredient are different from those that have epinephrine combined with another active ingredient, such as the anesthetics in issue.

He concluded (at paras 56 -58):

The anesthetics in issue supplied by the appellant are not designed to serve as an emergency relief for patients suffering from major death threatening conditions as required for being listed in paragraph (2)(e) of Part I of Schedule VI of the ETA.

The Legislator did not use on purpose in paragraph 2(e) the terms “mixture of drugs” as he did in paragraphs 2(b) and 2(d) of Part I of Schedule VI of the ETA.

In my view, by allowing epinephrine or any other drug listed in paragraph 2(e) to be mixed with other substances and to characterize this type of mixture with a zero-rating, would be contrary to the policy established by the Department of Finance.

Words and Phrases
drug

Administrative Policy

Excise and GST/HST News - No. 108 September 2020

CRA’s existing policy re drugs with mixed substances is consistent with Patterson Dental

[Patterson Dental held] that the supply of epinephrine in combination with an analgesic in the appellant’s solutions was not a single supply containing a taxable element and a zero-rated element, and was therefore not zero-rated … .

The FCA also determined that, even if the anesthetic solutions sold by the appellant were to be regarded as such a supply, the case law had established that the zero-rated element of a mixture had to be the principal element in a supply in order for the supply to be zero-rated. In the case of the anesthetic solutions sold by the appellant, even though epinephrine was an important element in the appellant’s anesthetic solutions, the FCA held that it was not the main or predominant element, and that the local anesthetic was the main element.

The CRA’s existing policy regarding the application of the GST/HST to drugs that are mixed substances or solutions is consistent with the decisions of the Courts.

Section 6

Administrative Policy

GST/HST Notice 312 Proposed GST/HST Treatment of Supplies of Human Ova and In vitro Embryos May 2019

Effect of zero-rating on importations

The first proposed amendment to the Act would add, under section 6 of Part I of Schedule VI to the Act, the supply of an ovum, as defined in section 3 of the Assisted Human Reproduction Act, to the list of drugs and biologicals that are zero‑rated for GST/HST purposes. Consequently, the importation of an ovum would be considered a non‑taxable importation for GST/HST purposes under section 6 of Schedule VII to the Act and therefore no longer subject to tax. Similarly, an ovum brought into a participating province from a non-participating province, or from another participating province for which the rate of the provincial part of the HST is lower, would be considered non-taxable property for GST/HST purposes under section 15 of Part I of Schedule X to the Act and therefore no longer subject to self-assessment for the provincial component of the HST, or part thereof.

Meaning of “ovum”

As defined in section 3 of the Assisted Human Reproduction Act, ovum means a human ovum, whether mature or not.

Treatment of the subject supplies before amendments passed

[S]uppliers can stop charging GST/HST on supplies of human ova in accordance with the proposed amendment as of March 20, 2019. … [C]onsistent with its standard practice, the CRA is administering this measure on the basis of the proposed amendment [and similarly re embryos]

If the proposed amendment becomes law, you may then contact the supplier, who may choose to adjust the amount charged, or refund or credit the amount collected. If so, the supplier must provide you with a credit note for the amount. Alternatively, you can file a rebate claim with the CRA for the amount paid in error … . However, the CRA cannot pay a rebate for an amount paid in error as or on account of tax until the proposed amendment becomes law.

A supplier who has charged or collected GST/HST on human ova supplied after March 19, 2019, must include that amount in the calculation of their net tax on their GST/HST return, and remit that net tax if there is a balance owing, according to the regular rules.

Assimilated to single supply at fertility clinic of institutional health care service

Where a patient of a fertility clinic or other health care facility undergoes treatment or other service at the clinic which includes the implantation of a human donor ovum or the transfer of an in vitro embryo, the CRA considers that the supply of the human donor ovum or in vitro embryo made by the clinic to the patient in these circumstances would generally be part of an exempt supply of an institutional health care service.

Locations of other summaries Wordcount
Tax Topics - Excise Tax Act - Schedules - Schedule VII - Section 13 356
Tax Topics - General Concepts - Effective Date CRA allows immediate application of the new non-supply rules for human ova or embryos but won’t process rebate claims until passed 156
Tax Topics - Excise Tax Act - Schedules - Schedule V - Part II - Section 1 - Institutional Health Care Service assimilation of provision of ovum or embryo to single supply at fertility clinic of institutional health care service 76

Part II

Section 11

See Also

Axelrod v. The King, 2022 TCC 157 (Informal Procedure)

a dentist providing a crown, implant or bridge was supplying an exempt health care service rather than a zero-rated artificial tooth

Dr. Axelrod, a dentist, provided dentures, bridges, crowns and implants and reconstruction materials for more than half of a tooth, which the parties agreed constituted artificial teeth within the meaning of Sched. VI, Pt. II, s. 11. Dr. Axelrod took the position that when he provided an artificial tooth to a patient, he was making a zero-rated supply under that provision. CRA reassessed him on the basis that he was making the supplies of artificial teeth, as acquired by him from the laboratory, to the patients as zero-rated supplies pursuant to Sched. VI, Pt. II, s. 11, and making supplies of services (regarding diagnosis, preparation work (such as measuring and taking impressions) and installation) that were exempted pursuant to Sched. V, Pt. II, s. 5. Sommerfeldt J instead found that Dr. Axelrod was making a single supply of exempt services pursuant to Sched. V, Pt. II, s. 5, so that his appeal was dismissed.

Before so finding, Sommerfeldt J first found that Dr. Axelrod was making a single supply to such patients, stating (at para. 30):

It is difficult to imagine that a patient of Dr. Axelrod would have wanted to acquire dentures, a bridge, a crown or an implant without Dr. Axelrod having first done all of the preliminary work necessary to ensure that the particular prosthesis would fit and function properly in the patient’s mouth, and without Dr. Axelrod actually installing the prosthesis in the patient’s mouth. Similarly, all of the dental services rendered by Dr. Axelrod would have made no sense if they had not related to the prosthesis desired by the patient. To use the language of O.A. Brown, both the supply of the prosthesis and the supply of the dental services were integral parts or components of the overall supply. … It is even more evident that all aspects of Dr. Axelrod’s reconstruction, in a patient’s mouth, of a significant portion of a tooth, using appropriate filling or restorative materials, were integral components of a composite supply.

He went on to indicate (at para. 55) that, to determine the character of the single supply, it was “necessary to identify all of the elements of the supply and then determine which element gave the supply its commercial efficacy, or in other words which element caused the payment of the consideration,” and then stated (at para. 57) that in light of the importance of the professional services provided by Dr. Axelrod, “the predominant element of the supply made by Dr. Axelrod to a patient was his professional dental services, and not the prosthesis per se.”

Sommerfeldt J further found that if, contrary to his single-supply analysis, Dr. Axelrod were regarded as making supplies that came within both Sched. V, Pt. II, s. 5 and Sched. VI, Pt. II, s. 11:

the exempt status of the supplies will preclude Dr. Axelrod’s dental practice (which is a business) from being a commercial activity, by reason of the exception at the end of paragraph (a) of the definition of the term “commercial activity” in subsection 123(1) of the ETA.

Words and Phrases
artificial
Locations of other summaries Wordcount
Tax Topics - Excise Tax Act - Schedules - Schedule V - Part II - Section 5 supply of crown or other prosthesis by dentist was a single supply of a health care service 417
Tax Topics - Excise Tax Act - Section 123 - Subsection 123(1) - Commercial Activity para. (a) made exempt supplies paramount over zero-rated supplies 179
Tax Topics - Excise Tax Act - Section 123 - Subsection 123(1) - Supply dentist was providing artificial teeth (listed as a zero-rated item) was making a single supply of health care services 346
Tax Topics - Excise Tax Act - Schedules - Schedule V - Part II - Section 34 legislative approach in VI-II-34 reinforced a conclusion that dental crown or implant work was an exempted service 66

Section 9

Cases

Contact Lens King Inc. v. Canada, 2022 CAF 154

a requirement to make supplies pursuant to a prescription did not require obtaining a copy of the prescription

The appellant, a U.S. corporation, sold and delivered contact lenses (typically replacement contact lenses) to Canadian consumers without requiring them to provide a copy of their matching prescription (with the FAQ on its website instructing the customers: "Take a look at one of the boxes of your contact lenses. You will see the brand name and prescription specifications on the box...".) Given that most sales were believed to be for replacement lenses, it was likely that most of the customers had in fact received prescriptions.

Contrary to the finding of the Tax Court below, LeBlanc JA found that the taxpayer (1) was not required by s. 9 (or s. 286(1)) to obtain and retain copies of its Canadian customers’ prescriptions, but (2) nonetheless was required to establish the prescriptions’ “existence by means of sufficient and credible evidence” (para. 7). Since the Tax Court had made no reversible error in finding that the taxpayer had failed to provide such evidence, its finding that the sales were not zero-rated under Sched. VI, Pt. II, s. 9 was sustained.

Regarding the first point, LeBlanc JA indicated:

  • “[T]here is no explicit reference in the text of Section 9 to the contact lens supplier being required to obtain from its customers, and subsequently retain, a copy of the Prescription.” (para. 27, TaxInterpretations translation)
  • The absence of such an explicit requirement contrasted, for instance, with the wording of the Input Tax Credit Information (GST/HST) Regulations requiring the receipt of particular documents.
  • “[T]he objective pursued by Parliament in enacting Part II of Schedule VI … appears to have been to alleviate the economic burden on persons with disabilities or impairments for whom such devices are a necessity, a social objective which argues for a generous interpretation of Section 9.” (para. 29)
  • A 1999 amendment, which expanded the relevant wording to reference a requirement that the contact lenses are “or are to be” supplied under a prescription, so as to permit the zero-rating of sales at earlier stages in the production and distribution process, “indicate a willingness on the part of Parliament to take a more flexible approach to the conditions for zero-rating contact lenses sold for the purpose of treating or correcting a vision disorder, and to what is necessary to demonstrate that these conditions have been met.” (para. 49)

He noted that the appellant after the reporting periods in issue had commenced requiring customers to certify that they had the prescription in their possession – and, regarding this customer attestation requirement, stated (at para. 85) that:

[I]t is not for this Court, in this context, to measure its impact on the burden imposed on the appellant. The question will surely arise in the future.

Locations of other summaries Wordcount
Tax Topics - Excise Tax Act - Section 286 - Subsection 286(1) no particular form of documentary evidence required by s. 286(1) 228
Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 230 - Subsection 230(1) taxpayer flexibility to determine corroborative documents 103
Tax Topics - Statutory Interpretation - Inserting Words not role of courts to add words 134

See Also

Contact Lens King Inc. v. The Queen, 2020 TCC 71, aff'd on other grounds 2022 CAF 154

on-line sales of contact lenses were not zero-rated given failure to copy purchasers’ prescriptions

The appellant, a GST/HST registered Nevada corporation with a distribution centre in New York state, sold and delivered contact lenses (typically replacement contact lenses) to Canadian consumers without verifying that they had a matching prescription (with the FAQ on its website instructing the customers: "Take a look at one of the boxes of your contact lenses. You will see the brand name and prescription specifications on the box...".)

In finding that such sales were not zero-rated under Sched. VI, Pt. II, s. 9, Smith J stated (at para. 69, TaxInterpretations translation):

[I]t is not sufficient … that the appellant's website inform the consumer of the need for a valid prescription. The appellant must itself obtain a copy of the prescription, as defined, from which it can be concluded that the consumer has a prescription "for the treatment or correction of a defect of vision."

Locations of other summaries Wordcount
Tax Topics - Excise Tax Act - Section 286 - Subsection 286(1) failure to obtain and retain copies of customers' prescriptions did not comply with s. 286(1) 238

Section 11.1

Cases

Canada v. Dr. Kevin L. Davis Dentistry Professional Corporation, 2023 FCA 76

single-supply doctrine should not be applied to orthodontic supplies

The respondent (Davis Dentistry) had claimed input tax credits (ITCs) on the basis that a portion of its supplies to each orthodontic patient was of a zero-rated supply of the orthodontic appliance, and that only the balance of what was supplied was an exempt healthcare service, whereas CRA had disallowed its ITC claims on the basis that under the single-supply doctrine as enunciated in O.A. Brown, there was a single supply of exempt orthodontic services. The Tax Court allowed the appeal on the basis that orthodontic appliances and orthodontic services were intended by Parliament to be separate supplies.

In dismissing the Crown’s appeal, Woods JA stated (at paras. 35, 37-39, and 42):

… Parliament’s intent must override O.A. Brown where legislative intent is clear as it is in the provisions applicable in this case. …

The particular circumstances of this case clearly call into question the application of O.A. Brown. Importantly, the applicable legislation (s. 11.1 of Part II of Schedule VI) is narrowly framed to describe a particular property, an orthodontic appliance. Further, the property has only one use – to move teeth or jaws. It is also relevant that the appliances provided to patients are almost invariably accompanied by orthodontic services. …

[T]he listing of orthodontic appliances in Schedule VI would have very limited application if the Crown’s position were correct.

In the case of a supply of orthodontic appliances and orthodontic services, which are typically supplied together, the fact that one has zero-rated status and the other has exempt status strongly suggests that this was intentional and that a supply of an orthodontic appliance is intended to be zero-rated even when accompanied by orthodontic services. …

It is highly unlikely that Parliament would explicitly provide that any supply of an orthodontic appliance is zero-rated if the intention is that the supply is restricted to the wholesale level.

Locations of other summaries Wordcount
Tax Topics - Excise Tax Act - Schedules - Schedule V - Part II - Section 5 orthodontist was supplying orthodontic services separately from zero-rated orthodontic devices 221
Tax Topics - Statutory Interpretation - Drafting Style imprecise drafting is not typical of taxing statutes 101

See Also

Dr. Kevin L. Davis Dentistry Professional Corporation v. The Queen, 2021 TCC 25, aff'd 2023 FCA 76

orthodontic practices make two supplies of services and devices

CRA disallowed ITCs claimed by one of the practices of orthodontist’s professional corporation on the basis that the patient invoices did not set out the consideration for the zero-rated supply of orthodontic appliances separately from the consideration for the exempt supply of orthodontic services. It assessed on the basis that the corporation through its practice was making a single supply of orthodontic services, so that all input tax credit (ITC) claims were denied.

Wong J noted (at paras. 19-20):

The Minister has an administrative arrangement with the Canadian Dental Association such that orthodontists may file their GST returns using 35% of the patient’s total treatment cost as an estimate of the consideration for the supply of the orthodontic appliance. When the actual figures become available (such as at year-end), orthodontists are then required to reconcile their 35% ITC estimate with their actual taxable supplies.

… The arrangement also requires that the orthodontist identify the consideration for the zero-rated supply of the appliance separately from the consideration for the exempt supply of services.

CRA considered that the corporation’s invoices did not comply with the last sentence quoted above.

After finding that the Finance explanatory notes to s. 23 indicated that Parliament intended for the zero-rating in Sched. VI, Pt. II, s. 11.1 of orthodontic appliances to be unconditional, she stated (at para.41):

The statute makes it clear (and Parliamentary intent confirms) that a conventional orthodontic practice consists of exempt supplies of services and zero-rated supplies of appliances. It is unnecessary to use the common law test for determining single versus multiple supplies or to consider whether the supply of an appliance is incidental to the supply of orthodontic treatment because the statute has directly addressed the tax status of both.

Accordingly, she confirmed the corporation’s position that it made both exempt and zero-rated supplies to its patients. Having regard to the CRA administrative practice and a statement in the agreement with the patient that “[o]ur orthodontic fee includes a portion, up to 35%, relating to the value of orthodontic appliances,” the zero-rated portion was 35%.

Locations of other summaries Wordcount
Tax Topics - Excise Tax Act - Regulations - Input Tax Credit Information (GST/HST) Regulations - Section 3 - Paragraph 3(b) invoices showing nil tax and not allocating between the included zero-rated and exempt supply complied with s. 3 369
Tax Topics - Excise Tax Act - Section 169 - Subsection 169(5) agreement with the Canadian Dental Association was an exercise of discretion under s. 169(5) 273

Dr. Brian Hurd Dentistry Professional Corporation v. The Queen, 2017 TCC 142 (Informal Procedure)

hypothetical separate supply of an orthodontic appliance by an orthodontist would have been zero-rated

Campbell J found that an incorporated orthodontic practice was making a single supply of exempt orthodontic health services rather than (as argued by it) two supplies comprised of a zero-rated supply of medical equipment (the orthodontic appliance) and of exempt orthodontic services (e.g., adjustment and maintenance services). She then rejected obiter the Crown's argument in the alternative that a separarate supply of the orthodontic appliances would not have been zero-rated but, instead, an exempt supply of a "medical...prosthesis" under Sched. V, Pt. II, s. 1 - "institutional health care service" para. (b), stating (at para 44):

…[I]f I had concluded that the Appellant provided multiple supplies, then … the supply of the orthodontic appliance would be zero-rated pursuant to section 11.1 of Schedule VI, Part II of the Act. … [T]he Act has set out the scheme for an orthodontic appliance entirely separate and apart from the provisions that apply to a prosthesis. … [T]he supply of an orthodontic appliance, being a medical device assembled by a licensed dental professional in a patient’s mouth, falls within the zero-rated scheme contained in Schedule VI. This interpretation is also consistent with the Department of Finance Technical Notes to section 11.1 of Schedule VI, Part II which unconditionally zero-rates an appliance.

Locations of other summaries Wordcount
Tax Topics - Excise Tax Act - Schedules - Schedule V - Part II - Section 5 single supply by incorporated orthodontist of health care services 262
Tax Topics - Excise Tax Act - Schedules - Schedule V - Part II - Section 1 - Institutional Health Care Service - Paragraph (h) single supply of orthodontic services by incorporated orthodontic practice qua health care facility 165
Tax Topics - Excise Tax Act - Section 123 - Subsection 123(1) - Supply single supply of orthodotic service 87
Tax Topics - Excise Tax Act - Schedules - Schedule V - Part II - Section 1 - Institutional Health Care Service - Paragraph (b) orthodontic appliance was not a "medical prosthesis" 164

Administrative Policy

7 April 2022 CBA Roundtable, Q.6

pending Davis Dentistry, CRA is treating orthodontic practices as making two supplies of services and devices

At the 2018 CBA Roundtable, Q.5 regarding Brian Hurd, and CRA’s administrative arrangement to allow 35% input tax credits to orthodontal practices, CRA indicated that it would prospectively phase-out that administrative arrangement and that it was preparing a publication discussing ITC availability to dentists and orthodontists.

Davis Dentistry (under appeal), which effectively applied that administrative practice to the orthodontic practice of a professional corporation even though it (contrary to the stated CRA requirement) did not show an allocation in its invoices between the two supply components, conflicted with Brian Hurd.

Regarding the status of its review, CRA stated:

[T]he CRA will wait for the decision of the Federal Court of Appeal before taking any more steps in regard to the 35% ITC administrative arrangement.

In the meanwhile, the administrative arrangement will remain in effect until further notice. The administrative arrangement continues to apply where a dentist or dental corporation follows the terms of the arrangement: the dentist identified the two separate supplies, for example, the invoice issued to the patient identifies the consideration for the supply of the orthodontic appliance or artificial tooth separately from the consideration for the supply of the dental service, and the ITC claim relates to mixed-use purchases (to make both taxable and exempt supplies) such as overhead and general operating expenses and certain direct expenses or inputs (for example, personal property such as arch wires used exclusively to fabricate orthodontic appliances). The administrative arrangement does not include ITCs for capital property.

Locations of other summaries Wordcount
Tax Topics - Excise Tax Act - Section 123 - Subsection 123(1) - Supply CRA has postponed proceeding with treating orthodontists as making a single exempt supply 182

Section 24.1

See Also

Health Quest Inc v. The Queen, 2014 TCC 211 (Informal Procedure)

insufficient product design evidence

The appellant ("Health Quest") distributed footwear for the relief of various disabling conditions of the foot. The Minister reassessed the taxpayer on the basis that many of the shoes sold were not zero-rated supplies under s. 24.1 of Part II of Schedule VI of the ETA. Campbell J found that the Minister's pleading of this legal conclusion did not shift the burden of proof to the taxpayer (see summary under General Concepts - Onus).

The Minister was unable to prove that the shoes were not specially designed for use for a "crippled or deformed or similarly disabled foot," as the appeal officer's evidence was based on there not being sufficient information to conclude that they were. Campbell J suggested that "product literature, any scientific studies conducted and testimony of medical professionals" would have been beneficial in drawing any conclusions (para. 37) and indicated (at para. 41) that Masai Canada Ltd. v. Canada (Border Services Agency), 2012 FCA 260 "implied that to establish if a product, at least under the Customs Tariff, is 'specially designed' there should be evidence on the design and purposive intent behind the design of the product."

Locations of other summaries Wordcount
Tax Topics - General Concepts - Onus mixed assumptions of fact and law 189

Section 32

See Also

Tremblay v. The Queen, [2001] GSTC 64 (TCC) (Informal Procedure)

An elevator shaft constructed by the builder of the appellant's home in order to permit the operation of a wheelchair lift provided by a separate supplier was found to be an "accessory" essential for the use of the lift, so that its supply was zero-rated under section 32.

Section 33

Administrative Policy

Excise and GST/HST News, No. 104, July 2018

qualifying service animals

The following are considered service animals for purposes of section 33:

  • seeing-eye horses (miniature ponies);
  • seeing-eye dogs;
  • hearing-ear dogs;
  • seizure alert or response dogs;
  • special service skills dogs that can assist pulling a wheelchair, carrying or picking up items or providing balance for an individual with mobility difficulties; and
  • other special skills service animals that offer assistance to young adults with autism or provide emotional support for individuals with mental health issues.

Additionally, section 33 also zero-rates the supply of a service of training an individual to use the service animal if the service is provided by an organization that is operated for the purpose of supplying such specially trained animals to individuals with a disability or impairment. Where an organization’s purpose is to train service animals and individuals to use service animals, rather than supplying the service animal, the supply of any training services provided to an individual to use the service animal is generally taxable.

Section 34

See Also

Buccal Services Ltd. v. The Queen, [1994] GSTC 70 (TCC)

A healthcare facility through a dentist (as independent treatment provider) provided various laboratory and diagnostic services such as special x-ray studies, photographs and anesthesia facilities. The appellant had a paucity of evidence to support its submission that 40% to 50% of the supplies made by it were zero-rated supplies. Kempo T.C.J. went on to reject a submission that dental supplies made by the appellant fell within ss.23 (now, 11.1) 25, 26 and 34 of Part II of Schedule VI, stating that "where the service is clearly included in Schedule V, the exempt status of that service would govern and take precedence over the zero-rating provisions" (p. 70-3) and found that the services provided were institutional healthcare services instead.

Administrative Policy

4 May 2021 GST/HST Ruling 199267 - Tax paid on construction services

installation of wheelchair hoist was subsumed in single supply of taxable renovation work

CRA found that a registered charity received a single supply of renovation work notwithstanding that an identified component of the work was installing a hoist for a wheelchair lift which, had it been a separate supply, might have been zero-rated under Sched. VI, Pt. II, s. 34. It stated that the component “elements are so intertwined and interdependent that they must be supplied together.”

Locations of other summaries Wordcount
Tax Topics - Excise Tax Act - Section 123 - Subsection 123(1) - Supply renovation work constituted a single supply so that component wheelchair hoist work was not zero-rated 246

Section 37

Administrative Policy

Excise and GST/HST News - No. 97 17 November 2015

Design features must assist in coping with incontinence

To be an incontinence product specially designed for use by an individual with a disability, the product must be designed to absorb leakages, reduce odours, control bacteria, maintain dryness, and protect the individual against skin irritation. As such, the product must be designed using high-absorbency materials and typically have a sealed edge to ensure leakage protection. The fact that a product is reusable or disposable, or can be used by an individual who does not have a disability is not sufficient to change the characteristics of a product so that it is no longer considered to be an incontinence product specially designed for use by an individual with a disability.

…Examples of products that are not zero-rated under this provision include waterproof chair pads, sheets and mattress covers.

Children’s diapers…are not zero-rated… .

Part III

Section 1

See Also

River Road Co-Op Ltd. v. The Queen, [1995] GSTC 34 (TCC)

A direct charge retail co-operative charged $3.50 per week to each member of the co-operative irrespective of the type or volume of goods purchased by the member. Lamarre TCJ. concluded that such service fees did not constitute partial payment for goods purchased by the members and, therefore, no portion of such fees qualified for zero-rating.

Locations of other summaries Wordcount
Tax Topics - Excise Tax Act - Section 153 - Subsection 153(2) 64

Administrative Policy

29 March 2017 Ruling 183173

dietary supplement is not zero-rated

In finding that a bottled product that was to be mixed with water did not qualify under Sched. VI, Pt II, s. 1, CRA stated:

[T]he CRA considers a product to be a food or beverage if an average consumer would recognize and purchase the product as such in the ordinary course of buying basic groceries. … Consumers usually consume food and beverages to sustain or maintain life, to allay hunger or thirst, or for enjoyment rather than for therapeutic or preventative effects … .

Products commonly referred to as dietary supplements are consumed for their therapeutic or preventative effects (e.g., to correct actual or perceived health problems), or to achieve specific beneficial effects related to performance or physique. This also includes products that are labelled or marketed as products to be consumed primarily to facilitate the intake of ingredients that place an emphasis on such claims. Products commonly referred to as dietary supplements are not considered to be basic groceries and are not within the scope of section 1 of Part III of Schedule VI. …

T]he Product on its own is not a beverage, but rather is taken with water to allow for the ingestion of the Product. The Product is to be consumed in accordance with recommended dilution instructions. The Product is not a food, beverage, or an ingredient. The Product is a dietary supplement and, as such, is not zero-rated as a basic grocery.

GST/HST Technical Information Bulletin B-110 Application of the GST/HST to the Practice of Acupuncture April 2017

Separate supplies of herbal goods by acupuncturist

Sales of products such as dried herbs and herbal goods for medicinal purposes are generally separate supplies made by the acupuncturist and do not form part of an acupuncture service. As such, most sales of these products are subject to the GST/HST. Such products also include botanical medicines, Chinese herbal medicines, and tinctures, ointments, and nutritional supplements, whether or not dispensed by an acupuncturist….

Paragraph 1(e)

See Also

Ike Enterprises Inc. v. The Queen, 2017 TCC 59

crystallized ginger sold as baking ingredient rather than candy

The appellant sold crystallized ginger; sticks (made of wheat, rice and spelt); and granola in special packaging in bulk to retailers for sale in their bulk bins. Before turning to these individual items, Smith J stated (at paras 47-48):

[T]he Act…ensure[s] that basic groceries are not subject to GST. …

[T]he exclusions listed in section 1 of Part III…should be narrowly construed. To take a broad interpretation of such exclusions would defeat the policy objective noted above.

Smith J found that the crystallized ginger was zero-rated, finding (at paras 53, 54, 55, 57 and 58):

The first ingredient was … ginger.

The Appellant …had never sold this product as a candy or confectionery nor seen it sold as such by its customers in their bulk bins.

Taking a textual approach to the interpretation of section 1(e) of the Act, I find that the opening words “candies, confectionery that may be classed as candy, or any goods sold as candies”, clearly suggest that it is primarily intended to exclude food that is commonly viewed and sold as candy where the first ingredient is in fact sugar or some other natural or artificial sweetener. …

[M[ost consumers would be surprised to learn that products sold in the baking section of a typical grocery store, could be subject to GST

[T]he crystallized ginger …was sold as a baking ingredient similar to a dried fruit.

Words and Phrases
confectionary
Locations of other summaries Wordcount
Tax Topics - Excise Tax Act - Schedules - Schedule VI - Part III - Section 1 - Paragraph 1(f) fried sticks were sold as snack and were not baked 233
Tax Topics - Excise Tax Act - Schedules - Schedule VI - Part III - Section 1 - Paragraph 1(h) granola in cereal aisle intended primarily as breakfast cereal 194

Paragraph 1(f)

See Also

Ike Enterprises Inc. v. The Queen, 2017 TCC 59

fried sticks were sold as snack and were not baked

The appellant sold crystallized ginger; sticks (made of wheat, rice and spelt); and granola in special packaging in bulk to retailers for sale in their bulk bins. Before turning to these individual items, Smith J stated (at paras 47-48):

[T]he Act…ensure[s] that basic groceries are not subject to GST. …

[T]he exclusions listed in section 1 of Part III…should be narrowly construed. To take a broad interpretation of such exclusions would defeat the policy objective noted above.

In finding that the sticks came within the exclusion from zero-rating in para. 1(f), Smith J stated (at paras 59, 62, and 63):

…[T]he sticks … were manufactured by a company called “Old School Snacks” and the evidence clearly established that they were sold as snacks and eaten as‑is without further preparation.

…[T]he … sticks were not sold as crackers or “bread sticks” or even as a bread product. … [B]read products including crackers are in fact oven‑baked and not fried.

…I find that nothing turns on the fact that the sticks were marketed as a healthy organic snack. On balance, I find that the sticks are a convenience food captured by the use of the words “other similar snack foods” and more specifically the use of the word “sticks” in section 1(f) of the Act.

Locations of other summaries Wordcount
Tax Topics - Excise Tax Act - Schedules - Schedule VI - Part III - Section 1 - Paragraph 1(e) crystallized ginger sold as baking ingredient rather than candy 251
Tax Topics - Excise Tax Act - Schedules - Schedule VI - Part III - Section 1 - Paragraph 1(h) granola in cereal aisle intended primarily as breakfast cereal 194

Paragraph 1(h)

See Also

Ike Enterprises Inc. v. The Queen, 2017 TCC 59

granola in cereal aisle intended primarily as breakfast cereal

The appellant sold crystallized ginger; sticks (made of wheat, rice and spelt); and granola in special packaging in bulk to retailers for sale in their bulk bins. Before turning to these individual items, Smith J stated (at paras 47-48):

[T]he Act…ensure[s] that basic groceries are not subject to GST. …

[T]he exclusions listed in section 1 of Part III…should be narrowly construed. To take a broad interpretation of such exclusions would defeat the policy objective noted above.

In finding that the granola was not excluded from zero-rating under para. 1(h), Smith J found (at paras 68, 70):

… [M]any types of breakfast cereals can be snacked “right out of the box” and the suggestion on the packaging that you can do so, does not change a breakfast cereal into a snack item or convenience food. ...

While I agree that packaging and labelling will generally carry the day, I find that product placement within the grocery store is equally determinative. … [I]ts customers sold the product in question in the cereal aisle of the grocery store… .

Words and Phrases
breakfast cereal
Locations of other summaries Wordcount
Tax Topics - Excise Tax Act - Schedules - Schedule VI - Part III - Section 1 - Paragraph 1(e) crystallized ginger sold as baking ingredient rather than candy 251
Tax Topics - Excise Tax Act - Schedules - Schedule VI - Part III - Section 1 - Paragraph 1(f) fried sticks were sold as snack and were not baked 233

Paragraph 1(k)

See Also

Hubka v. The Queen, [1995] GSTC 58 (TCC)

Supplies of ice cream made in the form of boxes of 12, 24 or 36 single serving packages were excluded from zero-rating by s. 1(k). Bonner TCJ. stated (at p. 58-3):

"I cannot discover any basis either in the language of para. (k) or in the statutory context for arriving at a conclusion that the packaging which contains the single serving packages of ice cream is in any way relevant. The plain language looks to the packaging of the ice cream and not to the packaging of the packages."

Part V

Section 1

See Also

Muller v. Baldwin, L.R. 9 Q.B. 457

In the absence of anything in the governing legislation to the contrary, "exported from the port" was to be construed in its ordinary meaning of "carried out of the port" and, therefore, included coals taken out of the port on a steamer to be consumed on board during a distant voyage.

Words and Phrases
exported

Administrative Policy

8 March 2018 CBA Commodity Tax Roundtable, Q.9

no zero-rating of sale to Cdn purchaser who provided physical delivery of goods in Canada to NR ultimate purchaser

Company B, a registered resident, agreed to sell tangible personal property (the “Property”) to Company C, an unregistered non-resident, using the Incoterms® 2010 DAP Port of Liverpool, U.K. so that delivery and title transfer was to occur at the U.K. destination – although the parties agreed that Company C was to indemnify Company B if the Property were lost or damaged in transit. The Property is then loaded onto Company C’s vessel at the Port of Halifax and was immediately exported.

CRA indicated that it appeared that, because Company C acquired physical possession of the Property in Canada pursuant to the terms of the agreement, s. 142(2)(a) did not apply to deem the supply to be outside Canada. Similarly, CRA indicated that as the delivery of the Property by Company B to Company C appeared to be in Canada, zero-rating under Sched. VI, Pt. V, s. 1 also would not be available for the preceding supply of the Property by a Canadian registered vendor (Company A) to Company B.

Locations of other summaries Wordcount
Tax Topics - Excise Tax Act - Section 142 - Subsection 142(2) - Paragraph 142(2)(a) Incoterms did not govern the place of delivery of goods 154

GST/HST Memorandum 4.5.2 (4-5-2) "Exports – Tangible Personal Property" August 2014

Overview of requirements

3. A supply of tangible personal property (other than an excisable good) made by a person to a recipient (other than a consumer) who intends to export the property is zero-rated if all of the following conditions are met:

  • a. in the case of property that is a continuous transmission commodity that the recipient intends to export by means of a wire, pipeline, or other conduit, the recipient is not registered for GST/HST;

    b. the recipient exports the property as soon after the property is delivered by the person to the recipient as is reasonable having regard to the circumstances surrounding the exportation, and where applicable, to the normal business practice of the recipient;

    c. the recipient has not acquired the property for consumption, use, or supply in Canada before exportation;

    d. after the supply is made and before the recipient exports the property, the property is not further processed, transformed, or altered in Canada, except to the extent reasonably necessary or incidental to its transportation; and

    e. the person maintains evidence satisfactory to the Minister of National Revenue of exportation of the property by the recipient.

Intent to export vs actual export of the property

7. Tangible personal property will generally be regarded as exported where the property is carried or sent out of Canada for trade, consumption, use, or supply by the recipient outside Canada, and the property is not consumed, used, or supplied en route before delivery to a place outside Canada. The recipient must have the intention of exporting the property when the supply is made in order for it to be zero-rated. However, ...[t]he recipient must export the property in fact.

As soon after the property is delivered by the person to the recipient as is reasonable

9. Whether tangible personal property is exported "as soon after the property is delivered by the person to the recipient as is reasonable" will depend on the facts of each situation, including the type of property involved and the general business practices of the recipient. The CRA will consider the following factors where the supplier can provide documentary evidence why the property was not exported either immediately after the supply was made, or in the time frame originally anticipated:

  • a late shipment from a subcontractor delays the shipment of the whole consignment;
  • transportation obstacles have been encountered;
  • some tangible personal property is held in inventory while awaiting delivery of other property before exporting all of the property at once;
  • the delay is attributable to the recipient's normal business practice; or
  • other situations have resulted in unexpected delays.
Satisfactory evidence of exportation

16. The acceptability of the evidence of exportation will depend on whether the entire shipment of the tangible personal property can be traced from its origin in Canada to the point where it leaves Canada on its way to a foreign destination. [E]vidence…will vary depending on the mode of transportation…and the nature of the property. Satisfactory evidence may include…:

  • sales invoice or purchase contract that identifies the property and the recipient, matched with the respective shipping or delivery instructions on the purchase order;
  • transportation document…such as a bill of lading…which is evidence of a contract of carriage as well as proof of delivery of the property on board a vessel (additional information… is available in GST/HST Memorandum 28.2, Freight Transportation Services);
  • customs brokers' or freight forwarders' invoice that relates to the exported property;
  • import documentation required by the country to which the property is exported;
  • in the case of motor vehicles, boats, ships, and aircraft, registration from the foreign regulatory authority where the property has been licensed;
  • or any other evidence (…not generated internally by the recipient)…that the property has been exported.

CBAO National Commodity Tax, Customs and Trade Section – 2013 GST/HST Questions for Revenue Canada, Q. 1

prosecution or civil remedy

Where the taxpayer has failed to provide information pursuant to a requirement under s. 289.1, "CRA's general policy is to proceed with a compliance order under section 289.1 (civil court remedy) prior to seeking the prosecution provision under section 326.)

94 CPTJ - Q. 1

RC will be amending its administrative policy to allow certificates to be issued by purchasers containing prescribed information as evidence of exportation. However, the exporter may be required to make available to the Department the shipper's balance sheet statements and any other evidence necessary to verify the zero-rated export purchases.

Section 2

Administrative Policy

GST/HST Memorandum 4.5.2 (4-5-2) "Exports – Tangible Personal Property" August 2014

Example 3

An unregistered non-resident airline is supplied with meals for consumption on board, and parts used to operate the aircraft while the aircraft is transporting passengers or property to a destination outside Canada. The supplies of meals and parts are zero-rated.

Example 4

A cruise ship stops at a Canadian port while transporting passengers between places outside Canada. During the cruise ship's stay in port, the unregistered non-resident operator of the cruise ship rents bicycles for use by some of its passengers. The supplies of rented bicycles to the operator are not zero-rated because they are not acquired for consumption, use or supply by the operator in the course of transporting passengers.

Paragraph 2(a)

Administrative Policy

7 April 2022 CBA Roundtable, Q.14

zero-rating under s. 2(a) for supplies to an airline relates to connected property or services, but not to the aircraft itself

Does Sched. VI, Pt. V, s. 2 zero-rate all property that is purchased or leased by a non-resident airline whose sole activity is to carry on the business of transporting passengers? In particular, would an aircraft that is being leased or purchased for consumption and use by the airline in transporting passengers qualify for zero-rating? CRA responded:

The words “in the course of” in section 2 are interpreted as imposing the following two requirements:

  1. the person must be transporting passengers or property, whether the conveyance (i.e., ship or aircraft) is mobile or immobile, at the time the person consumes, uses or supplies the property or service acquired by the person; and
  2. the consumption, use or supply of the property or service by the person must be connected with or arise from the provision of the service of transporting the passengers or property. …

[P]roperty and services that could be eligible for zero-rating under this provision include:

  • fuel and other supplies;
  • railway junction and switching charges, pilotage services, aircraft landing fees; railway right-of-way charges, and warehouse fees;
  • stevedoring services;
  • spare parts, repair, and maintenance services; and
  • air navigation services.

We are not aware of a case where a conveyance, described in section 2 of Part V of Schedule VI, would be the actual property being supplied under the provision. As a result, it would be necessary to review all of the relevant facts surrounding a particular transaction in order to determine whether zero-rating under section 2 could occur.

Words and Phrases
in the course of

Section 5

Administrative Policy

16 March 2018 Ruling 158124

zero-rating of marketing assistance provided by Canco to U.S. affiliate

As a small part of its business, a U.S. resident who is not registered for GST/HST purposes (“USco”) supplies information services to Canadian businesses and individuals, who subscribe by credit card through a website hosted on a U.S. web server and with the information services being delivered electronically to them from that server. USco will now receive expanded assistance respecting marketing to its Canadian customers from its Canadian resident affiliate ("Canco"). The "New Services" include much of the marketing work including strategy development, weekly “prospecting” of accounts, assistance in the preparation of term sheets and proposals for delivery to prospective clients and in the negotiation of contract terms and drafting contracts, use of the Canco website as a portal in communicating with current and prospective purchasers and attending key trade events to promote the USco information services.

The Services Agreement between Canco and USco stipulates that Canco is not acting as agent of USco; and Canco does not have contact with the customers.

Ruling that the supplies of New Services by Canco to USco are zero-rated pursuant to Sched. VI, Pt. V, s. 5.

Locations of other summaries Wordcount
Tax Topics - Excise Tax Act - Section 240 - Subsection 240(1) USco’s use of a Canadian affiliate for substantial marketing support for web-delivered services did not constitute carrying on business in Canada 356
Tax Topics - Income Tax Act - Section 2 - Subsection 2(3) - Paragraph 2(3)(b) USco not carrying on business in Canada by virtue of extensive marketing assistance (without client contact) work provided by Canadian affiliate 228

CBAO National Commodity Tax, Customs and Trade Section – 2013 GST/HST Questions for Revenue Canada, Q. 17. ("Supplier Reliance on Purchaser Certificates")

Respecting a certificate of a non-resident that it is not carrying on business in Canada:

CRA has not indicated in GST/HST Memorandum 4.5.1, nor in any other publication, that such a document would be accepted by the CRA as proof that a non-resident is not carrying on business in Canada for purposes of zero-rating a supply under Part V of Schedule VI to the ETA. A supplier may not rely on such documentation as acceptable proof that a non-resident person is not carrying on business in Canada for purposes of zero-rating a supply under Part V of Schedule VI to the ETA.

Section 6.1

Administrative Policy

8 March 2018 CBA Commodity Tax Roundtable. Q. 17

unscheduled repairs not necessarily emergency services

In the railway industry, maintenance orders generally are tracked as either scheduled maintenance - or as “bad orders,” being for repair services of railway rolling stock other than regularly scheduled maintenance, many of which arise where required repairs to rolling stock cannot be timely completed at U.S. facilities. Would all “bad orders” qualify as an emergency repair service? CRA responded:

As described in … 4-5-3 … an “emergency” is an unforeseen event or combination of events that calls for immediate action. The repairs must be of an urgent nature, such that if not immediately undertaken, the existing conditions could seriously affect the safety of the conveyance, the property or passengers being transported, or the people working on or about the conveyance. Whether a particular repair service referred to as a “bad order” would qualify as an emergency repair service for purposes of section 6.1 of Part V of Schedule VI … would depend on the facts of each situation.

Words and Phrases
emergency

GST/HST Memorandum 4.5.2 (4-5-2) "Exports – Tangible Personal Property" August 2014

Emergency

38. The term "emergency" is not defined in the Act but generally refers to an unforeseen event or combination of events that calls for immediate action. The repairs must be of an urgent nature that if not immediately undertaken, could seriously affect the safety of the conveyance, the property, or passengers being transported, and the people working on or about the conveyance. The application of sections 6, 6.1 and 6.2 of Part V of Schedule VI depends on the facts associated with each situation.

  • Example 6 While transporting an empty tank car from Montréal to Québec City, the domestic carrier notices that one of the wheels of the tank car is damaged. The carrier delivers the empty tank car to a repair facility operated by a firm specializing in repairing railway rolling stock. The repair firm contacts the unregistered non-resident lessor of the tank car and obtains authorization to repair the tank car. Following the repairs, the tank car is returned to the carrier for transportation to Québec City. The parts supplied to the unregistered non-resident, along with the emergency repair service, are zero-rated.

Section 6.3

See Also

ACN 154 520 199 Pty Ltd (in liquidation) v Commissioner of Taxation, [2020] FCAFC 190

gold refining included refining gold that was already at the precious metal level of purity

The applicant (“ACN 154”) described its business to the respondent (the Commissioner) as involving the acquisition and refining of scrap gold (i.e., gold that was not in investment form) produce precious metal (relevantly defined in the GST Act to mean gold, in an investment form, of at least 99.5% fineness) for sale to dealers. The majority of the scrap gold acquired by ACN 154 was already of at least 99.99% fineness, but nevertheless was scrap gold because it was not in investment form.

Under s. 38-385 of the A New Tax System (Goods and Services Tax) Act 1999 (Cth) (the “GST Act”), a supply of precious metal was “GST-free” if, relevantly, it was the “first supply of that precious metal after its refining by … the supplier”. In the course of allowing ACN 154’s appeal and in finding that the above supplies came within s. 38-385, the Court stated (at paras. 137, 145):

[N]either the text nor the context of s 38-385 supports the construction adopted … by the Tribunal, namely that “processes which are not directed towards increasing the metallic purity of the gold above the requisite standard of fineness (99.5% in the case of gold) should not be regarded as ‘refining’”. The ordinary meaning of the word “refining” … and the statutory context suggest that the word “refining” in s 38-385 is referring to a process by which metal is brought to a finer state or form. It may be accepted that, as the Commissioner submits, this is concerned with increasing the metallic fineness of the metal. But this does not require that the process be directed towards increasing the metallic fineness of the metal above the requisite standard of fineness (99.5% in the case of gold). …

It is the nature of the processes, rather than their purpose, that is critical in determining whether they constitute “refining”. Thus, even if …the primary objective of these processes was to provide quality assurance (rather than to increase the metallic purity), the processes nevertheless constituted “refining” in the sense outlined above.

Words and Phrases
refining
Locations of other summaries Wordcount
Tax Topics - Excise Tax Act - Section 123 - Subsection 123(1) - Precious Metal market criteria for gold to be in investment form 312

Section 7

Cases

Canada v. Adboss, Ltd., 2023 FCA 201

Minister’s pleaded “assumption” that a recipient’s “controlling mind and management” was in Canada went to the heart of the availability of zero-rating

The Minister’s reply, to the taxpayers’ appeals of assessments denying zero-rating of taxable supplies made by them to a Cyprus company (“Lowfroc”) on the basis that Lowfroc was a resident of Canada, pleaded an “assumption” that “at all material times, the controlling mind and management of Lowfroc was in Canada.”

After confirming that the quoted assumption was one of mixed fact and law, Goyette JA further confirmed the finding below that there had been prejudice to the taxpayers and an abuse of process (justifying the striking of this assumption pursuant to Rule 53(1)(c)) given inter alia that this pleading “went to the heart of the appeal” (para. 22) and that the Crown had refused the taxpayers’ request for particulars in this regard, so that the taxpayers accordingly “had few options if they wanted to know what factual assumptions they must demolish in order to succeed in their appeal” (para. 22).

Locations of other summaries Wordcount
Tax Topics - Other Legislation/Constitution - Federal - Tax Court of Canada Rules (General Procedure) - Section 53 - Subsection 53(1) - Paragraph 53(1)(c) the Minister’s assumption that a company’s “controlling mind and management” was in Canada was an abuse of process 184

See Also

Adboss, Ltd. v. The King, 2022 TCC 125, aff'd 2023 FCA 201

residence of corporate recipient determined by location of its central management and control

The Minister’s reply, to the taxpayer’s appeal of an assessment of it to deny zero-rating of taxable supplies made by it to a mooted non-resident (“Lowfroc”) on the basis that Lowfroc was a resident of Canada, pleaded “assumptions” including that Lowfroc was incorporated in Cyprus, that the taxpayer had no correspondence with any Lowfroc-connected persons in Cyprus and that “at all material times, the controlling mind and management of Lowfroc was in Canada.” Lafleur J found that the quoted phrase referenced the jurisprudential test of “central management and control,” and further noted (at para. 18) that the “location of the ‘central management and control’ of a corporation … is actually the legal test that must be applied to determine the residency of a corporation.” In explaining the decision to strike under Rules 53(1)(a) (“delay … fair hearing”) and (c) (“abuse of … process”), she stated (at para. 37):

[B]ecause the Appellant will have to speculate as to the facts underlying the conclusion of mixed fact and law of the Minister that the “controlling mind and management” of Lowfroc was in Canada, and because the Appellant therefore cannot be properly prepared for and proceed with discoveries, this will prejudice or delay the fair prosecution of the appeal and constitutes an abuse of the Court’s process.

Locations of other summaries Wordcount
Tax Topics - Other Legislation/Constitution - Federal - Tax Court of Canada Rules (General Procedure) - Section 53 - Subsection 53(1) - Paragraph 53(1)(c) assumption that a company’s “controlling mind and management” was in Canada struck as a mixed statement of fact and law 239

Administrative Policy

8 December 2022 GST/HST Interpretation 222719 - Supplies of digital marketing services made to a non-resident

meaning of advisory service

A resident registrant (CanCo) provided, to non-resident clients from a location in Canada, digital advertising, digital marketing, content marketing strategy and social media services.

CRA ruled that such services were not zero-rated under ETA Sched. VI, Pt. V, s. 8 as supplies of an advertising service made to an unregistered non-resident person, given that those services did not themselves entail creating advertising messages, and did not directly relate to communicating such messages. However, it noted that such services might be zero-rated under Sched. VI, Pt. V, s. 7 or s. 23. Regarding s. 7, it stated:

The CRA generally interprets an advisory service to mean a service of giving an opinion, or counsel, or of recommending a plan or course of action, while a consulting service refers to a service of providing information, instruction or expert advice; a consultant generally provides services relating to a field of specialized knowledge or training. An advisory or consulting service may address business, management, marketing, data processing, public relations, or other issues or problems faced by the client. However, such service is not considered to include any work that might be undertaken or performed as a result of the plans or recommendations accepted by the client or the advice provided to the client.

Words and Phrases
advisory service
Locations of other summaries Wordcount
Tax Topics - Excise Tax Act - Schedules - Schedule VI - Part V - Section 8 digital marketing services were not zero-rated 391
Tax Topics - Excise Tax Act - Schedules - Schedule VI - Part V - Section 23 meaning of professional service 204

"GST/HST In Electronic Commerce", CCRA Discussion Paper, November 2001.

Locations of other summaries Wordcount
Tax Topics - Excise Tax Act - Section 143 - Subsection 143(1) 0

23 October 2000 Interpretation 11640-1

The Canadian operator of an internet auction site would be considered, with respect to non-resident vendors, to be arranging for, procuring or soliciting orders for supplies made by them. The payment of an annual fee by vendors for the right to list items on the auction site would be considered to be consideration for a supply to them of a right and would not be eligible for zero-rating and would be deemed by s. 142(1)(c)(i) to be a supply made in Canada.

  GST/HST Memorandum 4.5.1 “Exports - Determining Residence Status” January 1998

Supplier responsible for determining zero-rated residency status of recipient including s. 132(2) branches

Non-resident requirement

3. Along with ensuring that all other zero-rated requirements are met, registrants making supplies in Canada to non-resident recipients to which sections 2, 5 to 10, 13, 14, and 17 to 23 of Part V of Schedule VI apply should verify and obtain evidence that the recipients are non-residents for the purposes of the GST/HST prior to zero-rating supplies to those recipients.

Non-resident/deemed non-resident ss 123(1) and s 132

4. Subsection 123(1) defines a non-resident as "not resident in Canada"; however, section 132 provides for certain situations where a person who might otherwise be a non-resident will be deemed to be resident in Canada. …

Responsibility of resident supplier to obtain certificate or other residency evidence

Responsibility of registrant suppliers

16. Suppliers who are registrants are responsible for determining the residence or registration status of their customers. For the supply to be zero-rated, satisfactory evidence should be retained by suppliers, indicating that their customers are non-residents and, where applicable, not registered for GST/HST purposes.

Documentation

17. Appendix A describes the documentation that the Department will generally accept as proof that the person is a non-resident. Appendix B describes the documentation that the Department will generally accept as proof that the customer is both a non-resident and is not registered. This documentation should be dated and signed by the non-resident and be effective on the date the supply is made. The Department will consider other forms of documentation as proof of non-residence and the non-registered status of the customer.

6 May 1998 HQ Letter

administrative services provided to an RRSP with a non-resident beneficiary and a resident trustee will be zero-rated if paid for by the annuitant and taxable if funded out of the trust.

Paragraph 7(d)

Administrative Policy

GST/HST Memorandum 4.5.3 “Exports – Services and Intellectual Property” June 1998

Principles re "in respect of" exclusion

Determining connection between service and property

46. The following guidelines help in determining whether the connection between the service and the real or tangible personal property is sufficient for the service to be "in respect of" the property for purposes of paragraphs 7(d) and (e) and paragraphs 23(b) and (c) of Part V of Schedule VI.

  • purpose or objective

(a) Was the service designed, developed or undertaken to fulfil or serve a particular need or requirement arising from or relating to the property? This guideline involves determining the purpose or objective of the service.

  • contract between supplier and recipient

(b) The purpose or objective of the service may often be determined by examining a written contractual agreement for the supply between the supplier and the recipient of the service. If there is no formal written agreement, other documentation such as purchase orders, correspondence between the parties or invoices or receipts may be useful in establishing the purpose or objective of the service. It is important that the supplier's understanding of the purpose or objective of the service, as reflected in the contractual agreement with the non-resident customer, be taken into consideration. The supplier's perspective is important because it is the supplier who must determine whether the consideration for the service is zero-rated. The Department may assess a supplier for uncollected GST/HST, whichever is applicable, if the supply was zero-rated in error.

  • relationship between service and property

(c) Is the relationship between the purpose or objective of the service and the property reasonably direct? The relationship between the service and the real or tangible personal property must be more direct than indirect for the service and the property to be considered by the Department to be "in respect of" each other for purposes of paragraphs 7(d) and (e) and paragraphs 23(b) and (c) of Part V of Schedule VI. If some object comes between the service and the property, the connection becomes more remote.

Service and property in respect of each other

47. A service and property would generally be regarded as being in respect of each other pursuant to the above guidelines if the purpose of a service is to:

  1. physically count the property;
  2. appraise or value the property;
  3. physically protect or secure the property; or
  4. enhance the value of the property.

Similarly, if the service is aimed at effecting or dealing with the transfer of ownership of, claims on or rights to real property or tangible personal property, or determining title to the property, the service will generally be regarded as in respect of property, and will therefore be excluded from the zero-rating provision.

Examples of Canadian real property exclusion

48. The following are examples of services that are considered to be in respect of real property for purposes of Part V of Schedule VI:

  1. services physically performed on the real property (e.g., construction and maintenance);
  2. services that enhance the value of the real property, affect the nature of the real property, relate to preparing the real property for development or redevelopment, affect the management of the real property, or affect the environment within the limits of the real property (e.g., engineering, architectural services, surveying and subdividing, management services, security services);
  3. services related to;
    1. the transfer or conveyance of the real property or the proposed transfer or conveyance of the real property (e.g., real estate services in relation to the actual or proposed acquisition, lease or rental of the real property, legal services rendered to the owner or beneficiary or potential owner or beneficiary of real property as a result of a will or testament);
    2. a mortgage interest or other security interest in the real property; or
    3. the determination of the title to the real property.

Paragraph 7(f)

Administrative Policy

28 February 2019 CBA Roundtable, Q.8

soliciting orders for Canadian customer of NR did not oust zero-rating

A registered non-resident (NR) does not itself have any presence in Canada but uses a resident (sub)contractor (RC) to provide marketing and soliciting services (in the credit card processing line of business) to a resident Canadian company in consideration for commissions. There is no formal agency agreement in place between NR and RC. CRA stated:

Section 7 of Part V of Schedule VI to the ETA zero-rates the supply of a service made in Canada to a non-resident person unless the service is specifically excluded by paragraphs 7(a) through 7(h) of that section. Based on the limited information provided, it appears that the supplies of services made by RC to NR would be zero-rated pursuant to section 7.

Locations of other summaries Wordcount
Tax Topics - Excise Tax Act - Section 142 - Subsection 142(1) - Paragraph 142(1)(g) registered non-resident marketer using services of a Canadian subcontractor was thereby making supplies in Canada 140

Section 8

Administrative Policy

8 December 2022 GST/HST Interpretation 222719 - Supplies of digital marketing services made to a non-resident

digital marketing services were not zero-rated

A resident registrant (CanCo) provided, to non-resident clients from a location in Canada, services comprised of digital advertising, digital marketing, content marketing strategy and social media services.

CRA ruled that such services were not zero-rated under Sched. VI, Pt. V, s. 8 as supplies of a service of advertising made to an unregistered non-resident person, stating:

[A]s described in … Memorandum 4-5-3 … the CRA generally considers an advertising service to be:

(a) a service of creating a message oriented towards soliciting business, attracting donations, or calling public attention in the form of an information notice, a political announcement or other similar communication by any means including oral, written, or graphic statements and representations disseminated by any means, including,

(i) in a newspaper or other publication,

(ii) on radio or television,

(iii) in a notice, handbill, sign, catalogue, or letter, and

(iv) on a billboard or on real property; and

(b) a service directly related to the communication of such a message (e.g., air time on a broadcasting service, space in a publication) where,

(i) the communication service is supplied as part of the supply of a message as defined in paragraph (a) above, or

(ii) the person providing the communication service can demonstrate that, at the time the supply is made, the service is in relation to the supply of a message as defined in paragraph (a) above.

[Y]ou do not create the written digital content for [NRCo]’s clients and are not involved in posting the Ads on the social media platform. You are essentially providing advice on creating high quality social media content and marketing plan. … [CanCo] is not providing a service of creating a set specific advertising message, within the meaning of an advertising service as described under paragraph (a) above. The supply is also not considered to be a service directly related to the communication of a message; therefore, paragraph (b) above does not apply.

However, it noted that such services might be zero-rated under Sched. VI, Pt. V, s. 7 or s. 23.

Words and Phrases
advertising
Locations of other summaries Wordcount
Tax Topics - Excise Tax Act - Schedules - Schedule VI - Part V - Section 7 meaning of advisory service 222
Tax Topics - Excise Tax Act - Schedules - Schedule VI - Part V - Section 23 meaning of professional service 204

Section 10

See Also

Canada v. Dawn’s Place Ltd., [2006] GSTC 137, 2006 FCA 349

use of copyright in downloading images was only incidental

International subscribers to the registrant's internet website were granted a "non-exclusive, limited and revocable licence to download and view the content of the website" on their computer. In finding that the subscription fees were not zero-rated consideration, Sharlow J.A. quoted with approval a statement of the OECD Model Tax Convention on Income and Capital that:

"Thus, in a transaction that in essence is an acquisition of data or images transmitted electronically, any incidental copying is merely the means by which the data is captured and stored. The essential consideration for the payment in that case is the data, not the use of the copyright, even though copyright is incidentally used."

Locations of other summaries Wordcount
Tax Topics - Treaties - Income Tax Conventions - Article 12 incidental use of copyright in acquiring data did not create a copyright supply 119

Administrative Policy

B-090 "GST/HST and Electronic Commerce" July 2002

Software zero-rating (Example 1 under Supplies Made to Non-Residents)

[T]he supply of software is a supply of intellectual property.

GST/HST Memorandum 4.5.3 “Exports – Services and Intellectual Property” June 1998

Example -zero-rating of global database (para. 51)

Canadian company sells the international rights to operate a global database to a foreign company who pays the royalties to the Canadian company. As the recipient of the supply is a non-resident that is not registered for the GST/HST, the supply of such rights is zero-rated.

29 October 1997 Ruling HQR0000558

IP includes know-how

Respecting the provision of CD-ROM discs containing databases and software permitting the retrieval of the data, protected by copyright, CRA stated:

Intellectual property includes patents, trade marks, trade names, industrial designs and know-how.

Articles

James Swanson, David Ross, "Taxing Intangibles - GST and the Supply of Digital Images", GST & Commodity Tax, Vol. XVII, No. 4, May 2003, p. 25.

Section 10.1

Administrative Policy

8 April 2016 Ruling 158060

zero-rating of law society membership

A non-resident lawyer who does not practise law in Canada is a “not in Province” member of a specified Class of a provincial law society, and is provided with access to educational programs as a member. The lawyer is not present in Canada each time a supply of a membership is made to him or her, and is not registered.

Ruling

That as none of the exclusions in s. 10.1 applies, the supply of membership by the society to the lawyer is zero-rated.

CBAO National Commodity Tax, Customs and Trade Section – 2013 GST/HST Questions for Revenue Canada, Q. 33. ("Application of S. 10.1, Sch. VI, P. V – Service Related to Intangible Personal Property")

A Canadian GST-registered supplier sells custom software that it has been using to perform a service electronically, with such supplies being made in Canada. The purchaser is a non-resident who does not carry on any business in Canada, and will use the software to supply the same service to Canadian customers, with such supplies being deemed to be made outside Canada pursuant to s. 143.

After stating that the supply would be zero-rated under s. 10 (rather than 10.1) assuming the non-resident was not registered, CRA stated:

[I]f the intangible personal property supplied to the non-resident in the scenario were the type of intangible personal property that can be zero-rated under [s. 10.1]…and again assuming that the non-resident was not registered, the supply would not be excluded from zero-rating under that provision on the basis of the exclusion in subparagraph 10.1(b)(iii).

2 November 2012 Ruling Case No. 140160

Operator, a registered resident of province 1, has developed a program that consists of a secure network and various business, communications and software systems. The clients of the Operator are businesses that supply taxable goods and services and independent contract agents ("ICAs") who are contracted by the businesses to provide services. The ICAs are provided access to, and the use of, the program to provide their services. There are no restrictions with respect to where the program may be accessed and used by the businesses and the ICAs. Rulings that the supply made by the Operator to non-resident non-registered businesseses or ICAs of the right of access to, and use of, the program is a zero-rated supply of intangible personal property under section 10.1 of Part V of Schedule VI.

14 February 2012 Ruling Case No. 99181 [non-exclusive information use rights]

non-exclusive information use rights

A Canadian company which is a registrant (the "Resident Supplier") enters into an agreement with a non-registered non-resident company to supply it "with the non-exclusive use rights to information belonging to the Resident Supplier for an up front payment of CD$[…] and contingent payments of CD$[…] in each of the succeeding […] years." Ruling that there is a zero-rated supply of intangible personal property by the Resident Supplier under s. 10.1.

4 February 2012 Ruling Case No. 99181 [information licence]

information licence

A resident supplier agrees to supply an unregistered non-resident recipient with the non-exclusive use rights to information belonging to the supplier for an up front payment as well as and contingent payments for a number of the succeeding years.

As the Agreement contains no terms or conditions with respect to the location of the use of the rights, the supply is deemed by s. 142(1)(c) to be made in Canada. However, it is zero-rated under Sched. VI, Pt. V, s. 10.1.

GST/HST Info Sheet GI-034 "Exports of Intangible Personal Property" April 2007

Examples of supplies of IPP that will now be eligible for zero-rating under the proposed provision include:

  • subscriptions to Web sites that provide subscribers with a right to access and use digitized content on the site, such as information in a database or images, and that may also include a right to download a copy of the digitized content;
  • subscriptions to interactive Web sites that provide subscribers with a right to access and use digitized content, such as games, music and videos, on the sites while they are online;
  • digitized information, such as news items or stock market data, that is delivered electronically on a periodic basis to subscribers based on their personal preferences;
  • digitized products, such as music, images, and books, that are downloaded from Web sites and paid for individually. ...

The CRA will generally accept an online self-declaration by customers that they are not residents of Canada along with their complete home address as proof of residency, provided it is supported by another satisfactory verification method of residency such as:

  • if customers pay for the supplies of IPP by credit card or debit card, either a comparison of the customer's declared home address with the billing address, or
  • a comparison of the customer's declared home address with the location of the financial institution that issued the card; or the use of geo-location software.

B-090 "GST/HST and Electronic Commerce" July 2002

Factors that generally indicate that a supply made by electronic means is one of intangible personal property are:

  • a right in a product or a right to use a product for personal or commercial purposes is provided, such as:

    - intellectual property or a right to use intellectual property (e.g., a copyright); or

    - rights of a temporary nature (e.g., a right to view, access or use a product while on-line);

  • a product is provided that has already been created or developed, or is already in existence;
  • a product is created or developed for a specific customer, but the supplier retains ownership of the product; and
  • a right to make a copy of a digitized product is provided

Section 12

Cases

Escape Trailer Industries Inc. v. Canada (Attorney General), 2020 FCA 54

intent of ETA is to only zero-rate goods where they are shipped to a destination outside Canada

When a B.C.-based company (the “applicant”) sold an RV to a U.S. customer, it could have avoided the requirement to charge HST on the sale price by delivering the RV to the customer in the U.S. (so that under ETA s. 142 the place of supply would have been outside Canada) or by shipping the RV to the customer in the U.S. on a common carrier (thereby engaging zero-rating). Both options were cumbersome or inconvenient, and what it did instead was to deliver the RV to the customer in a parking lot just north of the border, with the customer then driving the RV across the border as the importer of record. When CRA assessed the applicant for failure to charge HST on the sales (on the basis that they were taxable under s. 142), the applicant paid the tax but then requested that CRA recommend a remission order under s. 23(2) of the Financial Administration Act. The requested grounds were three of the criteria set out in the CRA Remission Guide, namely, financial setback coupled with extenuating factors, incorrect CRA advice and “unintended results of the legislation.”

Locke JA affirmed the finding below that CRA had reasonably rejected these grounds. In commenting on the third ground, he stated (at paras. 21, 23):

[T]he Assistant Commissioner … stated that “the legislative intent [is] that only purchasers who are not consumers can take possession of goods in Canada for export on a zero-rated basis.” In so stating, he took into account the detailed conditions set out in section 12 of Part V of Schedule VI of the ETA. He also implicitly acknowledged the general intent noted in Montecristothat GST/HST should be limited to consumption within Canada. The next sentence of the Assistant Commissioner’s analysis is equally reasonable in view of the more particular intent reflected in the detailed conditions for zero-rating: “Goods purchased by non-resident consumers are only intended to be zero-rated if they are shipped to a destination outside Canada, or they are sent by mail or courier to an address outside Canada.” …

The Assistant Commissioner concluded reasonably that the predicament in which Escape Trailer found itself (being liable for HST amounts that were not collected from customers) was caused not by any unintended results of the legislation, but rather by its failure to comply with any of the detailed conditions for zero-rating.

Locations of other summaries Wordcount
Tax Topics - Other Legislation/Constitution - Federal - Financial Administration Act - Section 23 - Subsection 23(2) CRA had not unreasonably referenced the specific requirements of the zero-rating provision 249

See Also

Dow & Duggan Log Homes International (1993) Limited v. The Queen, 2019 TCC 280

CRA does not have the discretion to stipulate the documentary requirements for the s. 12 zero-rating

CRA assessed on the basis that sales by the appellant of log homes were not zero-rated under Sched. VI, Pt. V. s. 12. In contrast to Sched. VI, Pt. V. s. 1, s. 12 did not specify that the supplier “maintains evidence satisfactory to the Minister of the exportation of the property by the recipient.”

Wong J noted (at para 31):

This Court has previously held that the evidentiary threshold in section 1 of Schedule VI, Part V means: (1) that the Minister has the discretion to set the standard as to what evidence will satisfy her for the purposes of zero-rating under that section; and (2) this Court should not intervene unless the Minister commits a reviewable error in exercising her discretion… .

In rejecting the Crown’s position that the Minister had the same discretion under s. 12, Wong J stated (at paras. 37, 39):

I cannot agree with the Respondent that where one provision is silent as to an evidentiary threshold, it is appropriate or correct to take a threshold from another provision and apply it to the silent provision with the same force of law. …

[W]hen dealing with section 12, it is logical and reasonable to refer to the Minister’s list of satisfactory evidence for qualifying under section 1, as a guideline for section 12. However, there is nothing in the Act to support the interpretation that the Minister has discretionary authority to decide what constitutes adequate proof for the purposes of section 12 such that this Court should not intervene unless she commits a reviewable error.

However, with the exception of one transaction, there “was insufficient evidence available … to adequately trace any of the remaining transactions and conclude that they were zero-rated” (para. 47).

Locations of other summaries Wordcount
Tax Topics - Excise Tax Act - Section 168 - Subsection 168(9) meaning of deposit adopted 55

Administrative Policy

GST/HST Memorandum 4.5.2 (4-5-2) "Exports – Tangible Personal Property" August 2014

Common carrier

19. A "common carrier" is not defined in the Act but generally refers to a person engaged in the business of transporting property from place to place, and who offers services to the public for compensation.

  • Example 1
  • A Canadian resident purchases a vehicle from an automobile dealer located in Toronto. The resident asks the dealer to arrange for a common carrier to pick up the automobile from the dealer's lot and deliver it to the resident's son who is currently living in Portugal. The dealer hires a carrier on behalf of the resident to ship the vehicle to Portugal. The supply of the vehicle by the dealer to the Canadian resident is zero-rated provided the dealer maintains the appropriate documentary evidence of exportation.

Paragraph 12(a)

Cases

Montecristo Jewellers Inc. v. Canada, 2020 FCA 12

no zero-rating where no delivery to common carrier

Customers would purchase watches or jewellery at Vancouver stores of the appellant in order to take them as gifts on their regular trips to China. The appellant’s staff would personally take the items to the airport (shortly before the flight departure) where they were inspected by a CBSA officer who would stamp a completed E15 form (a Canadian customs form evidencing exportation of the listed items) and then essentially ensure or monitor that the items were not handed over to the customer until shortly before boarding. The Tax Court rejected the appellant’s contention that jewellery sold pursuant to what the appellant called its Export Sales Procedure was jewellery delivered or made available outside Canada within the meaning of paragraph 142(2)(a) of the Act, so that the appellant was not required to withhold and remit tax under the Act. The Court also rejected the appellant’s submission that the supply of jewellery was a zero-rated supply within the meaning of paragraph 12(a) of Part V of Schedule VI of the Act.

In dismissing the appeal, Dawson JA stated (at para 6):

[T]he Tax Court did not err in concluding that the supply of jewellery was not a zero-rated supply pursuant to paragraph 12(a) of Part V of Schedule VI of the Act. … Even on a broad interpretation of paragraph 12(a), the appellant did not ship the jewellery to a destination outside of Canada that was specified in a contract of carriage.

Locations of other summaries Wordcount
Tax Topics - Excise Tax Act - Section 142 - Subsection 142(1) - Paragraph 142(1)(a) “delivery” for ETA purposes had its meaning under the Sale of Goods Act 353

Montecristo Jewellers Inc. v. The Queen, 2019 TCC 31, aff'd 2020 FCA 12

items were not “shipped” to China under a “contract of carriage” when they were handed directly to the customer on boarding the aircraft

Customers would purchase watches or jewellery at Vancouver stores of the appellant in order to take them as gifts on their regular trips to China. The appellant’s staff would personally take the items to the airport (shortly before the flight departure) where they were inspected by a CBSA officer who would stamp a completed E15 form (a Canadian customs form evidencing exportation of the listed items) and then essentially ensure or monitor that the items were not handed over to the customer until shortly before boarding.

In finding that zero-rating was not available under s. 12(a), Lyons J stated (at paras 71, 78):

…[P]aragraph 12(a) … denotes an intention that a third party carrier would need to be engaged where the supplier “ships” the property to a destination outside Canada. This construction aligns with Parliament’s intent that exported goods are available for use (by the recipient or its designate) only outside Canada.

… As no third party carrier was engaged under a contract for carriage, I find that the appellant did not ship the Jewellery within the meaning of paragraph 12(a).

Locations of other summaries Wordcount
Tax Topics - Excise Tax Act - Section 142 - Subsection 142(1) - Paragraph 142(1)(a) delivery in Canada as full voluntary transfer of possession there 328

Section 14

Administrative Policy

GST/HST Memorandum 4.5.2 (4-5-2) "Exports – Tangible Personal Property" August 2014

Example 8

A manufacturer in Canada charges its customers for moulds required in manufacturing a specific product. The moulds remain in Canada but the goods produced with the use of the moulds are sold to both Canadian and American customers. The supplies of the moulds to the non-resident customers are zero-rated provided the moulds are for use directly in the manufacture or production of goods for the non-resident.

Section 15.1

Administrative Policy

May 2016 Alberta CPA Roundtable, GST Q.1

docs must evidence like-kind exchange, delivery places, and BN/name of registrant

What documentation satisfies Sch. VI, Pt. V, s. 15.1? CRA responded:

In order for the "first seller" to zero-rate the supply of the continuous transmission commodity to the "first buyer" referenced in Section 15.1 of Part V of Schedule VI, the "first buyer", in addition to the other requirements as set out in this provision, must supply evidence satisfactory to the Minister to the "first seller" that the continuous transmission commodity (CTC) has been supplied to a registrant and all or part of the consideration is property of the same class or kind delivered to the first buyer outside Canada.

The CRA would accept invoices and/or written agreements of the CTC exchanged between the first buyer and the registrant. The documentation should contain such information as would be required to determine the following:

  • The CTC exchanged is of the same class or kind purchased.
  • The place of delivery of the CTC to the registrant inside Canada.
  • The place of delivery of the exchanged CTC to the first buyer outside Canada.
  • Identity of the registrant including their BN.

GST/HST Memorandum 4.5.2 (4-5-2) "Exports – Tangible Personal Property" August 2014

62. Continuous transmission commodities situated in Canada are frequently exchanged for similar commodities situated outside Canada. For example, natural gas acquired in Canada on a zero-rated basis by an unregistered non-resident who intends to export the gas may instead be sold and delivered in Canada, without having been exported, to a registrant in exchange for the registrant's gas of the same class and kind already situated outside Canada. Persons may enter into such exchange agreements to minimize transportation costs and reduce shipping time without changing the zero-rated status of the transaction.

63. Generally, section 15.1 ensures that specified cross border exchanges of continuous transmission commodities transported by means of wire, pipeline, or other conduit qualify for zero-rating on a transaction basis rather than on the basis of physical flows.

64. Where the registrant who acquires the continuous transmission commodity from the first buyer is not acquiring the commodity for consumption, use, or supply exclusively in the course of commercial activities of the registrant, the supply is an imported taxable supply and the registrant is liable for tax under sections 218 and 218.1, calculated on the value of the consideration for the supply of the commodity.

Section 15.2

Administrative Policy

GST/HST Memorandum 4.5.2 (4-5-2) "Exports – Tangible Personal Property" August 2014

69. If the recipient subsequently neither exports the commodity as described in paragraph 15.2(a), nor supplies it as described in paragraph 15.2(b), the supply is still zero-rated if the supplier did not know or could not reasonably be expected to have known, at or before the latest time at which GST/HST in respect of the supply would have been payable if the supply were not zero-rated, that the recipient would not supply or export the commodity as required.

70. Where the commodity is not exported or supplied as declared in writing by the registered recipient, the supply to the recipient is an imported taxable supply. The recipient is liable for tax under sections 218 and 218.1, and an amount calculated under section 236.1, unless the commodity is acquired for consumption, use, or supply exclusively in the course of the recipient's commercial activities.

5 February 2013 Ruling Case No. 141852

Company A (a Canadian-resident registrant) sells crude oil for its market value to Company B (its U.S.-resident affiliate and also a registrant), with title and delivery occurring when it is injected into the pipeline, and with Company B being the importer of record into the U.S. Where Company B does not require the crude oil which it purchased, it will sell the crude back to Company A at the current market price, with payment generally made on a set-off basis. CRA stated:

If the recipient [i.e., Company B] does not know at the time of purchase whether the continuous transmission commodity, including a portion thereof, purchased from a particular supplier will be exported, then the recipient cannot and should not provide a written declaration stating that the commodity is intended to be exported in the circumstances described in paragraphs 1(b) to (d) of Part V of Schedule VI.

GST Memorandum (New Series) 3.7 (Draft), February 2012 para. 1040105: General Discussion. 2 August 2001 TI RITS 32561

"Where a registrant receives a zero-rated supply of natural gas intended for export and a taxable supply of natural gas that is not zero-rated because it is intended for sale in Canada, the fact that the gas purchased for export may be mixed with the gas purchased for supply in Canada does not affect the entitlement to purchase natural gas using an export declaration, provided that evidence is maintained that the quantity purchased for export is the same as the quantity exported."

Section 18

Administrative Policy

GST/HST Memorandum 20-8 “Educational Services Made to a Non-resident” December 2019

Meaning of competence to perform a trade

4. The CRA will consider a course to provide individuals with the competence to practise or perform a trade or vocation if the course has a direct link to skills that are recognized by the CRA as relating to an individual’s ability to gain or retain employment. …

Meaning of certificate, diploma or licence

5. Generally, courses for which students are not issued some form of documentation at their conclusion do not satisfy the “certificate, diploma, licence or similar document” criterion and are therefore not zero-rated under section 18 of Part V of Schedule VI. The CRA accepts, as meeting the documentary requirements, any document that demonstrates that the student has successfully completed a course of study and attests to the competence of the individual to practise or perform a trade or vocation.

Pass/fail element

6. To qualify for zero-rating under section 18 of Part V of Schedule VI, the course or courses leading to the certificate, diploma, licence or similar document must have a pass/fail element based on the evaluation of an individual’s performance on one or more tests, graded materials and/or projects. If a course is part of a series of courses making up a program, the individual’s performance may be evaluated on the program as a whole. Where, upon completion of a course, documentation is provided that does not attest to the competence of an individual to practise or perform a trade or vocation but merely states that the individual has taken and passed the course, the course will not qualify for zero-rating under section 18 … .

Safety training not zero-rated

Example 3

Corporation Tree-NB is a GST/HST registered incorporated non-profit organization resident in New Brunswick that provides, among other supplies, the supply of a service of instructing individuals in a safety training course tailored to appeal to the forest industry. Occasionally, a non‑registrant forestry company resident in northern Maine will send a new employee to Corporation Tree-NB’s day-long course held in New Brunswick. Corporation Tree-NB invoices the non-resident company and not the employee.

… While stand-alone industry safety courses may be beneficial, and in some cases a job requirement, on their own they would not be considered to lead to an occupation. As the course offered by Corporation Tree-NB does not lead to a diploma or certificate attesting to the competence of the individual to practice a trade or vocation, the course is not zero-rated under section 18 … .

No requirement re type of resident supplier

8. Unlike section 8 of Part III of Schedule V, there is no requirement under section 18 of Part V of Schedule VI that the supplier be a specific type of entity. … Zero-rated supplies made under section 18 of Part V of Schedule VI cannot be exempt under section 8 of Part III of Schedule V as section 8 specifically excludes zero-rated supplies.

GST/HST Memorandum 20-1 "School Authorities - Elementary and Secondary Schools" December 2019

No requirement that supplier be a school authority

34. Although section 18 of Part V of Schedule VI is similar to section 8 of Part III of Schedule V, there is no requirement under section 18 that the supplier be a school authority or any other specified type of entity. Where all of the conditions in section 18 of Part V of Schedule VI are satisfied, the supply will be zero‑rated regardless of who is providing the service.

Section 20

Paragraph 20(c)

Administrative Policy

3 April 2019 GST/HST Ruling 188947 - Tax status of supplies made by a municipality

exemption for building permits does not extend to charges for extra inspections or reviews or overtime

The Municipality, which issues Building Permits for the construction of new buildings or major renovations to ensure compliance with local by-laws, the Building Code, and health and safety standards, charges:

  • The Building Permit Fee, which covers two Reviews (of the building plans) and two inspections of the building (for compliance with the Building Code).
  • The Additional Review Fee (for a review of revised drawings where more than two Reviews have already been performed or substantial changes are made to the approved design during construction that requires additional building code or zoning reviews).
  • Re-inspection Fee (for an additional building inspection where more than two inspections have been requested).
  • Alternative Solutions Review Fee (for a review, for Building Code compliance, of an alternative solution or substantial change).
  • Inspection Fee (Overtime) (an additional charge for overtime building inspections).

After ruling that all of such fees were taxable other than the Building Permit Fee, and before also referring to the deeming effect of s. 146, CRA stated:

The exemption under paragraph 20(c) does not include supplies of property or services that are conditions leading up to the supply of a right identified in paragraph 20(c). For instance, the exemption in paragraph 20(c) would not apply to separate supplies such as inspection, research, survey, consultation, planning and advisory services that may be related to a permit application.

Locations of other summaries Wordcount
Tax Topics - Excise Tax Act - Schedules - Schedule VI - Part V - Section 20 - Paragraph 20(c) - Subparagraph 20(1)(c)(ii) fees for Municipality reviewing liquor licence application, including any public consultation charges, were exempt 86
Tax Topics - Excise Tax Act - Section 146 additional building inspection charges of municipality were taxable 88

Subparagraph 20(1)(c)(ii)

Administrative Policy

3 April 2019 GST/HST Ruling 188947 - Tax status of supplies made by a municipality

fees for Municipality reviewing liquor licence application, including any public consultation charges, were exempt

A Municipality, after reviewing an application for a liquor licence, charges fees in order to provide comments and recommendations to BC’s Liquor and Cannabis Regulation Branch. (“LCRB”). Separate fees are charged to inform the public of the consultation being undertaken by the Municipality.

After ruling that these fees were exempt under Sched. V, pt. VI, s. 20(c)(ii), CRA indicated that the Municipality is making a supply of assessing each Liquor Licence application in return for payment of the such fees.

Locations of other summaries Wordcount
Tax Topics - Excise Tax Act - Schedules - Schedule VI - Part V - Section 20 - Paragraph 20(c) exemption for building permits does not extend to charges for extra inspections or reviews or overtime 241
Tax Topics - Excise Tax Act - Section 146 additional building inspection charges of municipality were taxable 88

Section 22

Section 23

Administrative Policy

8 December 2022 GST/HST Interpretation 222719 - Supplies of digital marketing services made to a non-resident

meaning of professional service

A resident registrant (CanCo) provided, to non-resident clients from a location in Canada, digital advertising, digital marketing, content marketing strategy and social media services.

CRA ruled that such services were not zero-rated under ETA Sched. VI, Pt. V, s. 8 as supplies of an advertising service made to an unregistered non-resident person, given that those services did not themselves entail creating advertising messages, and did not directly relate to communicating such messages. However, it noted that such services might be zero-rated under Sched. VI, Pt. V, s. 7 or s. 23. Regarding s. 23, it stated:

A professional service is generally defined in terms of the individual providing the service and refers to a service provided by an individual whose vocation or occupation requires special, usually advanced, education and skills. For purposes of section 23 of Part V of Schedule VI, the service may be provided by a member of a professional association, a professional corporation or a similar body, which is recognized by a statute in at least one province or territory or by one federal body, and which enforces standards of professional practice as well as a code of ethics.

Words and Phrases
professional service
Locations of other summaries Wordcount
Tax Topics - Excise Tax Act - Schedules - Schedule VI - Part V - Section 8 digital marketing services were not zero-rated 391
Tax Topics - Excise Tax Act - Schedules - Schedule VI - Part V - Section 7 meaning of advisory service 222

31 August 2004 Headquarter Letter - RITS 50657

In indicating that legal services provided to a non-resident manufacturer to defend it against product liability claims would be zero-rated, the Directorate stated that:

"Legal services supplied to a manufacturer to defend against a product liability claim are not generally considered to be directly connected to the product, but rather directly connected to the manufacturer's objective of defending itself against the claim to minimize its potential legal liability."

24 July 2003 Ruling Case No. 41660

appraisal not zero-rated

Preparation of written appraisals of specific real properties located in Canada were "in respect of" such properties and, accordingly, were not zero-rated.

9 April 2001 T.I. 33818

Professional services provided to a non-resident insurer with regard to the liability of the non-resident insurer under an insurance contract relating to the insurance of real or tangible personal property situated in Canada were zero-rated. "Although the professional services relate to a liability of the insurer in relation to an insurance contract in respect of real or tangible personal property situated in Canada, the real or tangible personal property does not appear to be the direct object of the professional service."

P-169R Meaning of in Respect of Real Property Situated in Canada and in Respect of Tangible Personal Property that is Situated in Canada at Time the Service is Performed, for Purposes of Schedule VI, Part V, Sections 7 and 23 to the Excise Tax Act

"In respect of" criteria

The following guidelines will be applied by the Department to aid in the determination of whether the connection between the service and the real or tangible personal property is sufficiently direct for the service to be "in respect of" the property for purposes of Schedule VI, Part V, sections 7 and 23:

a) Was the service designed, developed or undertaken to fulfil or serve a particular need or requirement arising from or relating to the property? This guideline involves determining the purpose or objective of the service. The purpose or objective of the service may often be determined by examining a written contractual agreement for the supply between the supplier and the recipient of the service in order to ascertain whether the supply is zero-rated under the Act.

If there is no formal written agreement, other documentation, such as purchase orders, correspondence between the parties or invoices or receipts may be useful in establishing the purpose or objective of the service.

It is important that the supplier's understanding of the purpose or objective of the service, as reflected in the contractual agreement with the non-resident customer, be taken into consideration. The supplier's perspective is important because it is the supplier who must determine whether the supply is zero-rated or whether to collect the GST/HST on the supply.

b) Is the relationship between the purpose or objective of the service and the property reasonably direct? The relationship between the service and the real or tangible personal property must be more direct than indirect in order for the service and the property to be considered by the Department to be "in respect of" each other. If some object comes between the service and the property, the connection becomes increasingly remote.

15 June 2000 Headquarters Letter RITS 31364

A legal account rendered to a non-resident insurer was not zero-rated because the services were in respect of the defence of an individual involved in a motor accident in Canada.

1 September 1999 Headquarters Letter RITS HQR0001873

Ruling that a contingency fee charged to a non-resident could be pro-rated based on the litigation services provided by the law firm before and after the commencement of the litigation.

Memorandum (New Series) 4-5-3 "Export - Services and Intellectual Property" June 1998

48. The following are examples of services that are considered to be in respect of real property for purposes of Part V of Schedule VI:

  • (a) services physically performed on the real property (e.g., construction and maintenance);
  • (b) services that enhance the value of the real property, affect the nature of the real property, relate to preparing the real property for development or redevelopment, affect the management of the real property, or affect the environment within the limits of the real property (e.g., engineering, architectural services, surveying and subdividing, management services, security services);
  • (c) services related to;
  • (i) the transfer or conveyance of the real property or the proposed transfer or conveyance of the real property (e.g., real estate services in relation to the actual or proposed acquisition, lease or rental of the real property, legal services rendered to the owner or beneficiary or potential owner or beneficiary of real property as a result of a will or testament);
  • (ii) a mortgage interest or other security interest in the real property; or
  • (iii) the determination of the title to the real property.

Part VI

Part VII

Section 1

Subsection 1(1)

Continuous Journey

Administrative Policy

GST/HST Memorandum 28-3 [28.3] Passenger Transportation Services July 2019

Continuous journey where 1 ticket agent issues 2 tickets with 3-hour stopover (para. 6)

Example 4

An individual travels by bus from Windsor, Ontario to Chicago, Illinois, USA, then by air from Chicago to Cancun, Mexico; the bus arrives at the airport in Chicago 3 hours before the flight leaves. The individual receives separate tickets for the bus and the flight from his travel agent when he books the travel.

These passenger transportation services form a continuous journey.

GST/HST Info Sheet GI-170 "Charter Flights Supplied to Third-Party Charterers"May 2015

Continuous journey

[T]he supply of a "passenger transportation service" is a supply of a service of transporting or carrying travellers (i.e., an individual or group of individuals) by any mode of transportation available to the public (such as a bus, taxi, train, aircraft, or boat) as long as there is:

  • a mode of conveyance;
  • an operator of the conveyance who is independent of the travellers; and
  • an itinerary.

Generally, the supply of a charter flight to a third-party charterer is considered to be a supply of a passenger transportation service.

A supply that is a supply of property (such as a supply, by way of lease, licence or similar arrangement, of the use or right to use tangible personal property such as an aircraft) is not a supply of a passenger transportation service.

Example of zero-rated flight embarking from Canada

...Example 4

A third-party charterer and a carrier enter into a charter agreement for the supply of a charter flight that is a passenger transportation service that is part of a continuous journey. The charter flight is a one-way trip for a group of individuals travelling from Toronto, Ontario to Nassau, Bahamas. The carrier issues a travel document for the set of all passenger transportation services which specifies Toronto as the origin of the continuous journey.

Although the continuous journey originates in Ontario (a participating province), the supply of the passenger transportation service is zero-rated because the termination of the continuous journey is outside the taxation area.

Single v. multiple supply

A ferry flight is generally considered to be an input to a passenger transportation service. ...

[T]he fuel surcharges and the passenger/goods handling charges incurred by the carrier at airports other than its base are costs that the carrier has no choice but to incur in providing the specific air charter. When these charges are passed onto the third-party charterers, they are part of the consideration payable for the passenger transportation service.

Other costs, such as the ferry flights and the cost of accommodation, meals and ground transportation for aircraft crew, are for elements that are not supplied to the third-party charterer. Rather, these elements are inputs consumed or used by the carrier in providing the passenger transportation service. The charges for the ferry flights and crew costs would therefore form part of the consideration payable for the passenger transportation service.

However…the excess valuation charges for baggage would be viewed as a separate charge in respect of a passenger's baggage and not part of the consideration payable for the supply of the passenger transportation service.

Freight Transportation Service

See Also

Daville Transport Inc. v. The Queen, 2021 TCC 47

fuel supplies and maintenance services made to truckers were not part of the zero-rated “freight transportation service” made by them

The taxpayer (DTI) used its trucks, and independent contractors as drivers (to whom it paid a per-trip fee), to transport freight in Canada and the U.S. DTI was found by Russell J to bear the costs of the diesel fuel for the trips through the use by the drivers on its behalf of cards (enabling the participating Shell or other station to receive payment out of a prepaid balance made by DTI) and to bear the costs of maintenance of the trucks. He further found that charges made by DTI at the end of each trip to the drivers of $0.76 per mile for fuel, and $0.08 per mile for vehicular maintenance, were consideration for an on-supply by DTI to the drivers of fuel and maintenance services.

In finding that such fuel and diesel supplies were not consideration for a zero-rated supply by DTI, Russell J noted that such supplies were not part of the “freight transportation service” (“FTS”) made by each driver to DTI (given that the recipients of the diesel and maintenance supplies (the drivers) differed from the recipient of the FTS (i.e., DTI).

Locations of other summaries Wordcount
Tax Topics - Excise Tax Act - Section 142 - Subsection 142(2) - Paragraph 142(2)(a) trucking company was considered to make an immediate on-supply of fuel to truckers in the country where it acquired fuel at service stations 427
Tax Topics - Excise Tax Act - Section 142 - Subsection 142(2) - Paragraph 142(2)(g) apportionment of trans-border supplies of maintenance services 213

Stopover

Administrative Policy

GST/HST Memorandum 28-3 [28.3] Passenger Transportation Services July 2019

Interruption under 24 hours generally not a stopover

14. An interruption between 2 legs of a journey to transfer between conveyances is not considered a stopover when the interruption is 24 hours or less or ends with the next available scheduled transportation for the next leg of the journey. However, when the stop is longer than 24 hours and is for connection purposes only, the supplier or agent must provide supporting evidence that the interruption is not a stopover.

GST/HST Info Sheet GI-170 "Charter Flights Supplied to Third-Party Charterers"May 2015

"Stopover", in respect of a continuous journey of an individual or group of individuals, means any place at which the individual or group embarks or disembarks a conveyance used in the provision of a passenger transportation service included in the continuous journey, for any reason other than for transferring to another conveyance or to allow for servicing or refuelling of the conveyance.

A stop between two legs of a journey that is 24 hours or less is not considered to be a stopover. A stop of more than 24 hours between two legs of a journey will generally be considered to be a stopover where two or more tickets or vouchers are issued for the legs of the journey.

Subsection 1(1)

Section 2

See Also

Sunshine Coach Ltd v. The Queen, 2019 TCC 72 (Informal Procedure)

Alberta bus tours were not part of continuous journey performed outside Canada

The appellant was an Alberta-incorporated tour operator based out of Calgary that operated tour bus trips between a resort in Banff (“Sunshine Village”) and Alberta locations (usually Calgary or Canmore), although some of its charter services were for trips outside of Canada. In determining that zero-rating under Sched. VI., Pt. VII, s. 2 was not available, Campbell J found that, as there was no evidence that any of the disputed transportation services were provided outside of Canada, accordingly, the services are not zero-rated under s. 2 because neither the origin nor termination of any of those trips or any stopovers in respect to the services provided by the Appellant were outside Canada.

Locations of other summaries Wordcount
Tax Topics - Excise Tax Act - Schedules - Schedule VI - Part VII - Section 3 Alberta bus tours were not part of continuous journey entailing continuous flight 102
international flight tickets were not issued by agents for Canadian bus tour operator 76

Administrative Policy

GST/HST Memorandum 28-3 [28.3] Passenger Transportation Services July 2019

Exclusion if day trip returning to Canada

40. Specifically excluded from this zero-rating provision is a passenger transportation service that is part of a continuous journey if both the origin and termination of the journey are in Canada and, at the time the journey begins, the individual or group is not scheduled to be outside Canada for an uninterrupted period of at least 24 hours during the journey. Such continuous journeys (trans-border day trips) are subject to the GST/HST.

Example 7

A tour boat ride along the St. Lawrence River is not zero-rated if it starts and ends in Canada on the same day, even if the boat docks on the American side for lunch or sightseeing purposes.

Section 3

See Also

Sunshine Coach Ltd v. The Queen, 2019 TCC 72 (Informal Procedure)

Alberta bus tours were not part of continuous journey entailing continuous flight

The appellant was an Alberta-incorporated tour bus operator based out of Calgary that operated tour bus trips between a resort in Banff (“Sunshine Village”) and Alberta locations (usually Calgary or Canmore), although some of its charter services were for trips outside of Canada. In finding that zero-rating under Sched. VI.pt. VII, s. 3 was not available, Campbell J noted that the bus tickets issued by the Appellant did not include the airline tickets that international passengers used to travel into and out of Canada, nor did booking companies through which some passengers arranged travel act as agents of the taxpayer.

Locations of other summaries Wordcount
Tax Topics - Excise Tax Act - Schedules - Schedule VI - Part VII - Section 2 Alberta bus tours were not part of continuous journey performed outside Canada 112
international flight tickets were not issued by agents for Canadian bus tour operator 76

Administrative Policy

GST/HST Memorandum 28-3 [28.3] Passenger Transportation Services July 2019

Bus trip to Seattle and plane flight to Lima form continuous journey (para. 41)

Example 11

A bus ticket for return travel from Vancouver, British Columbia to Seattle, Washington, USA and a return air ticket from Seattle to Lima, Peru are issued together to a client of a Vancouver travel agency. The individual travels by bus from Vancouver to Seattle and boards a flight to Lima a few hours after arriving in Seattle. Two weeks later, the individual returns from Lima to Seattle by air and boards the bus to Vancouver a few hours after arriving in Seattle.

The passenger transportation services that form part of this continuous journey are zero-rated because the stopover is outside Canada and all places at which the individual embarks or disembarks the aircraft are outside Canada.

GST/HST Info Sheet GI-170 "Charter Flights Supplied to Third-Party Charterers"May 2015

Distinction between passenger transportation service to the public, who are independent of the operator, and lease of aircraft

Passenger Transportation Service

For GST/HST purposes, the supply of a “passenger transportation service” is a supply of a service of transporting or carrying travellers (i.e., an individual or group of individuals) by any mode of transportation available to the public (such as a bus, taxi, train, aircraft, or boat) as long as there is:

  • a mode of conveyance;
  • an operator of the conveyance who is independent of the travellers; and
  • an itinerary.

Generally, the supply of a charter flight to a third-party charterer is considered to be a supply of a passenger transportation service.

A supply that is a supply of property (such as a supply, by way of lease, licence or similar arrangement, of the use or right to use tangible personal property such as an aircraft) is not a supply of a passenger transportation service.

Example 1

A potential third-party charterer requests a charter flight from a carrier for travel from Calgary, Alberta to St. John’s, Newfoundland and Labrador. The carrier provides a quote outlining the details of the charter flight, specifying the type of aircraft and capacity, the date and time for departure and expected arrival, the airports where the passengers will embark and disembark the aircraft, the expected flight time, and the cost for the charter flight. The third-party charterer accepts the quote, and is issued an itinerary with more specific details, including the aircraft and the crew, the passenger boarding locations, the specific dates and times of the charter flight, and the expected fuel consumption.

The supply of the charter flight is a passenger transportation service for GST/HST purposes because:

  • the aircraft is a mode of conveyance;
  • the operator of the conveyance (i.e., the carrier) is independent of the travellers; and
  • the charter flight has an itinerary.

Section 4

Administrative Policy

GST/HST Info Sheet GI-170 "Charter Flights Supplied to Third-Party Charterers"May 2015

[T]he excess valuation charges for baggage would be viewed as a separate charge in respect of a passenger's baggage and not part of the consideration payable for the supply of the passenger transportation service.

For GST/HST purposes, there are specific place of supply and zero-rating provisions that apply to a service of transporting an individual's baggage when made by a supplier of a passenger transportation service that imposes a charge for the service. Generally, under these rules, when a carrier provides a separate service of transporting an individual's baggage in connection with the transportation of the individual (i.e., on a charter flight), the GST/HST applies to any excess valuation charge at the same rate as it applies to the passenger transportation service.

Section 5

Administrative Policy

GST/HST Memorandum 28-3 [28.3] Passenger Transportation Services July 2019

Zero-rating of charge for extending ticket (para. 55)

55. Where the supplier of a passenger transportation service provides a service (listed in paragraph 56 of this memorandum) and the original passenger transportation service would have been zero-rated under section 2 or 3 of Part VII of Schedule VI to the Act, the listed service is zero-rated even if it is supplied at a different time or at a different location.

Example 13

A registered supplier in Canada provides an individual with a return ticket for a zero-rated flight from Toronto, Ontario to Barcelona, Spain. While in Barcelona, the individual decides to stay another week and contacts the supplier to have the ticket for the flight home amended. The supply of a service of amending the ticket to extend the stay in Barcelona is also zero-rated.

Section 8

See Also

Andrews v. The Queen, 2017 TCC 23 (Informal Procedure)

drving car not transporting it

The taxpayer arranged for drivers to drive back to Canada the cars of those who had suffered an incapacitating medical emergency in the U.S. In finding that this did not qualify as a “service of transporting tangible personal property,” so that it was not zero-rated, V.A. Miller J found that the quoted definition of " freight transportation service" required that the property be carried by some mode of transport such as a vehicle, ship or rail car and that merely driving a car did not qualify as transporting it, stating (at para. 29) that:

[T]he vehicle cannot be both the personal property and the means of carrying it at the same time.

Locations of other summaries Wordcount
driving a car is not transporting it 209

Section 15

Administrative Policy

27 April 2018 Ruling 185888

medical repatriation services not international air ambulance services

The Corporation provides medical repatriation services which involve arranging to transport an individual (the patient) from a foreign hospital to a health care facility in the individual’s home country. This would include transport between the medical facilities and airports via ground transportation (ambulance, taxi, or limo), and commercial airline transportation in the company of a medical escort (registered nurses, physicians and advanced cardiac life support trained paramedics). The Corporation charges a daily rate for the medical escort and a fee for the medical equipment required by the patient.

After ruling that the services supplied by the Corporation were of medical escort services rather than of international air ambulance services, so that zero-rating pursuant to Sched. VI, Pt. VII, s. 15 was not available, CRA stated:

The dictionary definition and definition in the provincial legislation suggest that the meaning of “ambulance” is a special vehicle that is used to transport injured or ill individuals who require the care of a physician, nurse or other health care provider while being transported. …

The addition of a medical escort along with medical equipment and supplies would not transform a commercial aircraft into an air ambulance.

Words and Phrases
ambulance
Locations of other summaries Wordcount
Tax Topics - Excise Tax Act - Section 123 - Subsection 123(1) - Supply medical escort services were single supply 215
Tax Topics - Excise Tax Act - Schedules - Schedule V - Part II - Section 6 medical escort services could be single supply of nursing services where nurse etc. involved 200
Tax Topics - Excise Tax Act - Schedules - Schedule V - Part II - Section 5 medical escort services could be single supply of physician’s services where physician involved, but not including delegated paramedic services 199

Part IX

Section 1

Cases

Bank of Montreal v. Canada (Attorney General), 2020 FC 1014, aff'd 2021 FCA 189

interest expense of Canadian bank on foreign borrowings was a proxy for zero-rated supplies by it

Before going on to find that the Minister’s decision to reject (under s. 141.02(20)) the request of the registrant (“BMO”) for approval of an “output method formula” ITC allocation method (“OMF”) was reasonable, Walker J noted (at paras. 132-133) that both the Minister and BMO considered interest expenses on foreign borrowings to be a proxy for zero-rated supplies by BMO.

Locations of other summaries Wordcount
Tax Topics - Excise Tax Act - Section 141.01 - Subsection 141.01(5) flexibility in choice of ITC allocation method for non-FIs 116
Tax Topics - Excise Tax Act - Section 123 - Subsection 123(1) - Financial Service - Paragraph (d) borrowing and paying interest is the supply of a financial service 144
Tax Topics - Excise Tax Act - Section 141.02 - Subsection 141.02(18) Minister's rejection of bank's proposed methodology based on perceived distortions, was reasonable 478

National Bank Life Insurance v. Canada, 2006 FCA 161

zero-rating re insurance was to be dealt with under s. 2

The appellant provided administrative services to a non-resident company (Natcan) which operated in the reinsurance field and for which the appellant provides reinsurance for part of the risks it assumes in respect of customers obtaining mortgage loans. In finding that the supply of such services (which were not zero-rated under s. 2) was also not zero-rated under s. 1, Létourneau J.A. stated (at para. 8):

The only way of understanding section 1 and giving it a coherent meaning consistent with the principles of taxation, zero-rating and exempt supplies contained in the Act is to see and recognize in section 1, in the exception of a supply of services contained in section 2, an intention on the part of Parliament to deal in section 2 specifically and exhaustively with the financial services relating to an insurance policy. In other words, section 2 is a special and specific provision applicable to financial services relating to an insurance policy. In section 2, Parliament has defined the conditions under which the supply of such services will be zero-rated and only the supply of services which meet those conditions shall be so rated. Other supplies of financial services related to insurance policies are, pursuant to Part VII of Schedule V, entitled “Financial Services”, exempt supplies.

Locations of other summaries Wordcount
Tax Topics - Statutory Interpretation - Specific v. General Provisions zero-rating re insurance was to be dealt with exclusively under provision re insurance 147

See Also

CIBC World Markets Inc. v. The Queen, 2018 TCC 103, rev'd 2019 FCA 147

an ETA s. 150(1) election denied zero-rating for services provided to a parent’s non-resident branches

Administrative services provided by the appellant (“WMI”) to its parent (“CIBC”) respecting activities carried on by CIBC through its non-resident branches would have been zero-rated but for an ETA s. 150(1) election that had been made between them. WMI argued inter alia that although those non-resident branches were deemed non-resident persons respecting their branch activities for zero-rating purposes, they could not be members of a closely-related group to the extent of such activities.

Bocock J noted (at para. 56) that finding that the s. 150 election eliminated zero-rating was contrary to the purpose of the zero-rating provisions:

[T]he s.150 election, contemplated legislatively and purposively to add administrative simplicity to exempting inter-entity domestic supplies within listed financial institutions, has levied unrecoverable GST on supplies of services exported and consumed externally; an otherwise domestic consumption tax now renders a “sub-species” of exported financial services less competitive.

Nonetheless, he found that zero-rating was unavailable. On the text, “the non-resident branch is not excluded contextually from being a ‘member of a closely related group’,” (para. 44), and “had Parliament wished to exclude supplies to non-resident branches from application of the s.150 election, the legislation may have specifically done so” (para. 45). Furthermore (para. 54):

Parliament was aware of the general proposition that GST is refunded through ITCs on exports. This was the subsisting situation: section 1 of Part VII of the Exempt Schedule and Part IX of the Zero-rated Schedule were co-extensive prior to the enactment of section 2 [of Sched. V, Pt. VII]. If section 2 of Part VII of the Exempt Schedule had not been enacted, logically and constructively, the enactment of subsection 150 and the s.150 election, “deemed” financial services would have simply slipped into either sleeve of the Exempt Schedule or Zero-rated Schedule; domestically consumed “deemed” financial services falling within Schedule V and exported deemed financial services falling within Schedule VI by virtue of the exception in section 1 of Part VII of the Exempt Schedule. But section 2 was enacted and it deals specifically and exceptionally with “deemed” financial services under subsection 150(1). As such, the more general financial service is not left to simply fall within either Schedule V or Schedule VI based upon domestic or external consumption, but, as a “deemed” financial service, is exclusively diverted into the Exempt Schedule as an exempt supply.

Locations of other summaries Wordcount
Tax Topics - Excise Tax Act - Section 150 - Subsection 150(1) s. 150 election precluded zero-rating of services rendered to parent's NR branches 159

Administrative Policy

17 December 2015 Interpretation 153009

potential zero-rating re share issuances and dividends

A corporation, which is not engaged exclusively in commercial activities, issues shares and pays dividends to its shareholders, who are both resident and non-resident. After finding that the issuance of the shares and the dividend payments were financial supplies to the shareholders, CRA quoted Sched. VI, Part IX, s. 1 and stated:

If…the Corporation is a “financial institution”, this section may zero-rate an otherwise exempt supply of a financial service, provided the supply is not excluded by paragraphs (a) to (e) of section 1, or by section 2… .

Locations of other summaries Wordcount
Tax Topics - Excise Tax Act - Section 123 - Subsection 123(1) - Supply required shareholder communications not a supply 169
Tax Topics - Excise Tax Act - Section 123 - Subsection 123(1) - Financial Service - Paragraph (f) dividend a financial supply to recipient 81
Tax Topics - Excise Tax Act - Section 123 - Subsection 123(1) - Financial Service - Paragraph (d) share issuance a financial supply to shareholder 164

11 July 1997 Technical Interpretation HQR0000416

Sales commissions and trailer fees received by a dealer who sells units in a mutual fund to non-resident investors would be zero-rated.

Guide for Providers of Financial Services under "Zero-rated Financial Services"

General synopsis of ss.1 and 2.

Articles

David Schlesinger, "De Minimis Financial Institutions", 1995 Commodity Tax Symposium Papers, C. 17: Danny Cisterna, "Hot Topics for Financial Institutions," 1999 Commodity Tax Symposium Papers, C. 7: suggests that "relates to" requires a direct connection.

indicates that an investment by a financial institution in dividend-bearing treasury shares of a non-resident company is a zero-rated supply.

Paragraph 1(e)

Administrative Policy

25 March 2021 CBA Commodity Taxes Roundtable, Q.4

supplies of crypto not zero-rated if not acquired by supplier directly from the crypto “issuer”

Are supplies of VPI by financial institutions to non-resident persons zero-rated? CRA responded:

We note that paragraph 1(e) of Part IX of Schedule VI specifically excludes from zero-rating a supply of a financial service made by a financial institution to a non-resident person, where the service relates to a financial instrument (other than an insurance policy or a precious metal) that was acquired, otherwise than directly from a non-resident issuer, by the financial institution acting in the capacity as a principal. Therefore, in the circumstances where a particular supplier of a VPI acquired the VPI otherwise than directly from a non-resident issuer of the VPI, the supply of the VPI by that supplier would be an exempt financial service, regardless of whether the VPI is supplied to a non-resident person or not.

Locations of other summaries Wordcount
Tax Topics - Excise Tax Act - Section 123 - Subsection 123(1) - Financial Service - Paragraph (d) supplies of crypto to resident recipient are exempt financial services 181

Section 2

Paragraph 2(d)

Cases

Northbridge Commercial Insurance Corporation v. Canada, 2023 FCA 211

zero-rating for fleet insurance could be based on the relative expected claims experience for US accidents

The appellant (“Northbridge”) issued fleet insurance policies to trucking companies who operated their vehicles in both Canada and the U.S. The Tax Court had found that none of such supplies of insurance were zero-rated under Sched VI, Pt. IX, s. 2(d) on the basis that this provision referenced the ordinary location of the insured vehicles, and there was no evidence on that point – and accordingly confirmed the denial of Northbridge’s related input tax credit claims.

Before allowing the appeal, Webb JA stated (at paras. 34, 36 and 45):

The risk of a claim arising from an accident (or other insurable event) is linked to a geographic location. An accident (or other insurable event) occurs at a particular location. …

… Since the policies issued by Northbridge in part related to accidents (and other insurable events) that are usually situated outside Canada, the supply of a portion of the policies qualified as a zero-rated supply. …

“[R]isks” means the risk of a claim arising from an accident or other insurable event. To the extent that any insurance policy issued by Northbridge covered such risks that were ordinarily situated in the United States, the supply of such a policy would be a zero-rated supply. The risks would be ordinarily situated in the United States based on the historical data for claims arising from accidents in the United States.

Since the Tax Court had not considered the evidence relating to this point, the matter was referred back to the Tax Court for such consideration.

Words and Phrases
risks insurance
Locations of other summaries Wordcount
Tax Topics - Statutory Interpretation - Ordinary Meaning “risks” interpreted from perspective of insurer 119

See Also

Northbridge Commercial Insurance Corporation v. The Queen, 2020 TCC 132, rev'd 2023 FCA 211

zero-rating for fleet insurance must be assessed on a detailed vehicle-by-vehicle basis

The appellant issued fleet insurance policies to trucking companies who operated their vehicles in both Canada and the US. The appellant claimed input tax credits on the basis that 1/3 of its supplies of insurance were zero-rated under Sched VI, Pt. IX, s. 2(d). The 1/3 figure came from its historical analysis that 1/3 of its payouts under the policies it issued respected perils that arose in the U.S. (i.e., the policies to that extent “relate[d] to risks that are ordinarily situated outside Canada.”) The Minister denied those ITCs on the basis that none of such financial services were zero-rated.

Graham J set the stage for his analysis by stating (at para. 21):

Insurance has two components: the object of the insurance and the peril which that object is insured against. If an insurer issues a policy insuring against the theft of a painting, the peril is theft and the object of the insurance is the painting. … If, like the Appellant, an insurer issues automobile insurance, “the insured objects include the owner, driver, and occupants of the motor vehicle, as well as the automobile itself and its contents, whereas the insured perils include accidental loss, damage, injury, or death; legal liability; theft; vandalism; and fire."

He then concluded (at para. 69):

“[R]isks” means the objects of an insurance policy. Paragraph 2(d) treats the supply of an insurance policy as zero-rated to the extent that those objects are ordinarily situated outside Canada. A multi-factor approach should be taken when examining where the objects are ordinarily situated. If a policy insures more than one object, any apportionment of the supply of that policy into exempt and zero-rated parts should occur on an object-by-object basis.

In dismissing the appeal, he stated (at paras 72 and 73):

…The Appellant’s apportionment between exempt and zero-rated was done on a global basis. … [S]ection 2 is a very unique section under which an apportionment happens within a given supply on an object-by-object basis. The Appellant should have made a separate apportionment for each policy on a vehicle-by-vehicle basis for the vehicles covered by that policy.

… I do not have any specific evidence regarding the individual policies in issue, let alone evidence regarding the vehicles covered by those policies. Without this evidence, it is impossible for me to determine whether the supply of any given policy was partly zero-rated. This lack of evidence is a sufficient basis for me to dismiss the appeals and I do so on that basis.

However, in describing how he might have applied s. 2 had the appropriate evidence been before him, he stated (at paras 75, 76, 77, 78, 79):

Assuming that the evidence before me is representative…, I would have found that those policies related to risks that were ordinarily situated in Canada, that the supply of each policy was entirely an exempt supply and that the appeals should therefore be dismissed.

… I would have started my analysis by looking at the objects of the insurance (i.e. the vehicles). I would have focused on both the number of days that each vehicle spent outside Canada and the percentage of the overall kilometers travelled by each vehicle that occurred outside Canada.

I would have found the fact that the vehicles were all insured using the standard insurance terms for Ontario vehicles to be a relevant factor. …

… I would have considered …relevant … the jurisdiction in which the owners of the fleets were based; the location where regular maintenance on the vehicles was conducted; the jurisdiction in which the drivers were licensed; and the location where the vehicles were kept when not in use.

I may also have considered the reason why the vehicles left Canada. …

Words and Phrases
risks ordinarily situated

Section 3

Administrative Policy

Guide for Providers of Financial Services

Any supply of precious metals not described in s. 3 will be treated as a supply of a financial service.